Analysis of Load Balancing for a New Approach to Support Traffic Engineering in IPv6 Networks
Becerra Line Y., John Padilla
Abstract
Becerra Line Y., John Padilla
Abstract
Objective: To propose a solution to support traffic engineering in IPv6 networks; such proposal is based on IPv6 capabilities. Methods/Analysis: Our proposal uses the IPv6 flow label field for packet switching in IPv6 networks and it also uses extended traffic engineering protocols like RSVP-TE and OSPFv3-TE. An advantage of our approach is that an MPLS transport network is not required to support traffic engineering. Our solution makes use of the tunneling concept, which has a high potential to support traffic engineering because it allows separation of different traffic among service/users in different tunnels. In this paper, we describe the main characteristics of our proposal and also, we present the evaluation of load balancing, which is a typical situation in traffic engineering studies. We compare our approach with MPLS performance because it is a technology commonly used to support traffic engineering. Findings/Results: Results show that load balancing in our solution has similar performance than MPLS when the number of tunnels over links is optimized. Improvements: This evaluation proves that our layer-3 proposal has traffic engineering capabilities in IPv6 networks independently of lower layers. Keywords: IPv6, IPv6 Flow Label, Load Balancing, Packet Switching, Traffic Engineering
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective: To propose a solution to support traffic engineering in IPv6 networks; such proposal is based on IPv6 capabilities. Methods/Analysis: Our proposal uses the IPv6 flow label field for packet switching in IPv6 networks and it also uses extended traffic engineering protocols like RSVP-TE and OSPFv3-TE. An advantage of our approach is that an MPLS transport network is not required to support traffic engineering. Our solution makes use of the tunneling concept, which has a high potential to support traffic engineering because it allows separation of different traffic among service/users in different tunnels. In this paper, we describe the main characteristics of our proposal and also, we present the evaluation of load balancing, which is a typical situation in traffic engineering studies. We compare our approach with MPLS performance because it is a technology commonly used to support traffic engineering. Findings/Results: Results show that load balancing in our solution has similar performance than MPLS when the number of tunnels over links is optimized. Improvements: This evaluation proves that our layer-3 proposal has traffic engineering capabilities in IPv6 networks independently of lower layers. Keywords: IPv6, IPv6 Flow Label, Load Balancing, Packet Switching, Traffic Engineering
Key concepts: Multiprotocol Label Switching, Traffic engineering, Internet traffic engineering, Computer science, Computer network, IPv6, Traffic generation model, Network packet