2015•Unpublished venueRequires access

"Who/If/When to Marry, It's a Choice":A History of Forced Marriage in Canada, 1948-2008

Karlee Anne Sapoznik

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study of the regulation of marriage without consent provides irrefutable evidence of the longstanding history and persistence of forced marriages in Canada. Between 1948 and 2008, profound changes took place in the rhetoric about forced marriage, its regulation by the Canadian state, the ways in which it was contested, and the realities for persons in forced marriage situations. Drawing on archival research, case law and interviews, I argue that the freedom to choose who/if/when to marry in this period nevertheless remained fundamentally constrained. By accepting and assuming full and free consent to marriage was possible, as outlined in laws and human rights instruments in this period, Canadians ignored, overlooked and denied the structural dynamics, challenges, constraints and patriarchy that made full and free consent for all impossible. Beginning in a period where there is clear international and national prohibition of marriage without consent, this dissertation is periodized based on key legal reforms, changes, moments and themes involving Canadians and global actors who exchanged ideas, participated in events, actions and conversations on the issue of forced marriage. I provide conceptual clarity on what constitutes legal consent in marriage and when forced marriage meets the threshold of slavery. I analyse the many forms and contexts in which forced marriages took place, how and why they were perpetrated, accepted, negotiated and resisted. Importantly, feminist work to combat forced marriages in the period revealed fundamental flaws, structural inequalities, power dynamics and violence not only at the heart of forced marriages, but central to the institution of marriage as a whole. Further, contrary to racialized and anti-immigrant stereotyping, forced marriage in Canada cannot be reduced to an international, Aboriginal, immigrant or Muslim problem. As I demonstrate through a diverse range of complex cases, the history of forced marriage in Canada as a source, transit and destination country between 1948 and 2008 was far more complex.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study of the regulation of marriage without consent provides irrefutable evidence of the longstanding history and persistence of forced marriages in Canada. Between 1948 and 2008, profound changes took place in the rhetoric about forced marriage, its regulation by the Canadian state, the ways in which it was contested, and the realities for persons in forced marriage situations. Drawing on archival research, case law and interviews, I argue that the freedom to choose who/if/when to marry in this period nevertheless remained fundamentally constrained. By accepting and assuming full and free consent to marriage was possible, as outlined in laws and human rights instruments in this period, Canadians ignored, overlooked and denied the structural dynamics, challenges, constraints and patriarchy that made full and free consent for all impossible. Beginning in a period where there is clear international and national prohibition of marriage without consent, this dissertation is periodized based on key legal reforms, changes, moments and themes involving Canadians and global actors who exchanged ideas, participated in events, actions and conversations on the issue of forced marriage. I provide conceptual clarity on what constitutes legal consent in marriage and when forced marriage meets the threshold of slavery. I analyse the many forms and contexts in which forced marriages took place, how and why they were perpetrated, accepted, negotiated and resisted. Importantly, feminist work to combat forced marriages in the period revealed fundamental flaws, structural inequalities, power dynamics and violence not only at the heart of forced marriages, but central to the institution of marriage as a whole. Further, contrary to racialized and anti-immigrant stereotyping, forced marriage in Canada cannot be reduced to an international, Aboriginal, immigrant or Muslim problem. As I demonstrate through a diverse range of complex cases, the history of forced marriage in Canada as a source, transit and destination country between 1948 and 2008 was far more complex.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study of the regulation of marriage without consent provides irrefutable evidence of the longstanding history and persistence of forced marriages in Canada. Between 1948 and 2008, profound changes took place in the rhetoric about forced marriage, its regulation by the Canadian state, the ways in which it was contested, and the realities for persons in forced marriage situations. Drawing on archival research, case law and interviews, I argue that the freedom to choose who/if/when to marry in this period nevertheless remained fundamentally constrained. By accepting and assuming full and free consent to marriage was possible, as outlined in laws and human rights instruments in this period, Canadians ignored, overlooked and denied the structural dynamics, challenges, constraints and patriarchy that made full and free consent for all impossible. Beginning in a period where there is clear international and national prohibition of marriage without consent, this dissertation is periodized based on key legal reforms, changes, moments and themes involving Canadians and global actors who exchanged ideas, participated in events, actions and conversations on the issue of forced marriage. I provide conceptual clarity on what constitutes legal consent in marriage and when forced marriage meets the threshold of slavery. I analyse the many forms and contexts in which forced marriages took place, how and why they were perpetrated, accepted, negotiated and resisted. Importantly, feminist work to combat forced marriages in the period revealed fundamental flaws, structural inequalities, power dynamics and violence not only at the heart of forced marriages, but central to the institution of marriage as a whole. Further, contrary to racialized and anti-immigrant stereotyping, forced marriage in Canada cannot be reduced to an international, Aboriginal, immigrant or Muslim problem. As I demonstrate through a diverse range of complex cases, the history of forced marriage in Canada as a source, transit and destination country between 1948 and 2008 was far more complex.

Key concepts: Forced marriage, Law, Child marriage, Forced migration, Patriarchy, Political science, Institution, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
"Who/If/When to Marry, It's a Choice":A History of Forced Marriage in Canada, 1948-2008 — Research Paper | ScholarLens