2018Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global OpenOpen access

Abstract: Fibrin Tissue Sealant and Minor Skin Grafts in Burn Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Katherine Alan Grunzweig, Mona Ascha, Anand Kumar

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The indications for use of fibrin glue in skin grafting burn patients remains understudied. The purpose of this study is to review the efficacy of fibrin tissue sealant in skin graft adherence, establish guidelines for use of fibrin tissue sealant, and review the cost effectiveness of fibrin glue. METHODS: Publications with the following criteria were included: comparative human studies, autologous skin grafts, and autologous or commercial fibrin sealant. Outcomes assessed included evidence of engraftment, wound closure, rates of hematoma/seroma, graft loss and infection. Meta-analysis obtained pooled odds ratios for outcomes of interest. Cost analysis was performed using data available in the literature. RESULTS: 7 studies and 751 interventions (fibrin) and controls (staples) were included in the final analysis. 67.6% grafts with fibrin were 100% adherent by one week, vs 55.5% (OR 1.45, p=0.086). Complete wound closure by one month was 80.2% with fibrin, vs 73.3% (OR 1.34, p=0.187). Hematoma/seroma occurred 38.2% with fibrin, vs 64.7% (OR 0.487, p=0.122). Graft loss was higher in the control group, 21% vs 12.6% (OR 0.891, p=0.604). Average cost of fibrin glue was $50 per ml, and averaged costs of stapler and staple remover was $30 USD ($10–50). CONCLUSION: Fibrin glue is as effective as staples for adhering skin grafts, and trends towards lower rates of hematoma/seroma. In topographically complex regions, fibrin glue may be a better choice for adherence of skin grafts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The indications for use of fibrin glue in skin grafting burn patients remains understudied. The purpose of this study is to review the efficacy of fibrin tissue sealant in skin graft adherence, establish guidelines for use of fibrin tissue sealant, and review the cost effectiveness of fibrin glue. METHODS: Publications with the following criteria were included: comparative human studies, autologous skin grafts, and autologous or commercial fibrin sealant. Outcomes assessed included evidence of engraftment, wound closure, rates of hematoma/seroma, graft loss and infection. Meta-analysis obtained pooled odds ratios for outcomes of interest. Cost analysis was performed using data available in the literature. RESULTS: 7 studies and 751 interventions (fibrin) and controls (staples) were included in the final analysis. 67.6% grafts with fibrin were 100% adherent by one week, vs 55.5% (OR 1.45, p=0.086). Complete wound closure by one month was 80.2% with fibrin, vs 73.3% (OR 1.34, p=0.187). Hematoma/seroma occurred 38.2% with fibrin, vs 64.7% (OR 0.487, p=0.122). Graft loss was higher in the control group, 21% vs 12.6% (OR 0.891, p=0.604). Average cost of fibrin glue was $50 per ml, and averaged costs of stapler and staple remover was $30 USD ($10–50). CONCLUSION: Fibrin glue is as effective as staples for adhering skin grafts, and trends towards lower rates of hematoma/seroma. In topographically complex regions, fibrin glue may be a better choice for adherence of skin grafts.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The indications for use of fibrin glue in skin grafting burn patients remains understudied. The purpose of this study is to review the efficacy of fibrin tissue sealant in skin graft adherence, establish guidelines for use of fibrin tissue sealant, and review the cost effectiveness of fibrin glue. METHODS: Publications with the following criteria were included: comparative human studies, autologous skin grafts, and autologous or commercial fibrin sealant. Outcomes assessed included evidence of engraftment, wound closure, rates of hematoma/seroma, graft loss and infection. Meta-analysis obtained pooled odds ratios for outcomes of interest. Cost analysis was performed using data available in the literature. RESULTS: 7 studies and 751 interventions (fibrin) and controls (staples) were included in the final analysis. 67.6% grafts with fibrin were 100% adherent by one week, vs 55.5% (OR 1.45, p=0.086). Complete wound closure by one month was 80.2% with fibrin, vs 73.3% (OR 1.34, p=0.187). Hematoma/seroma occurred 38.2% with fibrin, vs 64.7% (OR 0.487, p=0.122). Graft loss was higher in the control group, 21% vs 12.6% (OR 0.891, p=0.604). Average cost of fibrin glue was $50 per ml, and averaged costs of stapler and staple remover was $30 USD ($10–50). CONCLUSION: Fibrin glue is as effective as staples for adhering skin grafts, and trends towards lower rates of hematoma/seroma. In topographically complex regions, fibrin glue may be a better choice for adherence of skin grafts.

Key concepts: Fibrin glue, Seroma, Sealant, Fibrin, Medicine, Surgery, Hematoma, Fibrin Tissue Adhesive

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Abstract: Fibrin Tissue Sealant and Minor Skin Grafts in Burn Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens