2017Open Journal for Studies in PhilosophyOpen access

Scientific Objectivity: How is it Possible?

Kamen Dimitrov Lozev

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The paper discusses the topic of scientific objectivity and how it can be achieved by revealing the views of both leading 20-th century thinkers -Max Weber and Sir Karl Popper.Weber's conception of 'value-free science' is discussed in the first part of the paper.My argument here is put forward according to which the conditions in Germany after WWI and the tendency to politicization of the 'German science' served as one of the reasons why Weber concerned himself with investigating scientific objectivity, both in scientific research and in teaching science in universities.The second part reveals Karl Popper's ideas on the topic of objectivity in science with special emphasis on scientific criticism and rational discussion as the basis of Popper's solution of the problem.Comparisons between the 'Weberian' and the 'Popperian' conceptions of scientific objectivity are drawn.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper discusses the topic of scientific objectivity and how it can be achieved by revealing the views of both leading 20-th century thinkers -Max Weber and Sir Karl Popper.Weber's conception of 'value-free science' is discussed in the first part of the paper.My argument here is put forward according to which the conditions in Germany after WWI and the tendency to politicization of the 'German science' served as one of the reasons why Weber concerned himself with investigating scientific objectivity, both in scientific research and in teaching science in universities.The second part reveals Karl Popper's ideas on the topic of objectivity in science with special emphasis on scientific criticism and rational discussion as the basis of Popper's solution of the problem.Comparisons between the 'Weberian' and the 'Popperian' conceptions of scientific objectivity are drawn.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper discusses the topic of scientific objectivity and how it can be achieved by revealing the views of both leading 20-th century thinkers -Max Weber and Sir Karl Popper.Weber's conception of 'value-free science' is discussed in the first part of the paper.My argument here is put forward according to which the conditions in Germany after WWI and the tendency to politicization of the 'German science' served as one of the reasons why Weber concerned himself with investigating scientific objectivity, both in scientific research and in teaching science in universities.The second part reveals Karl Popper's ideas on the topic of objectivity in science with special emphasis on scientific criticism and rational discussion as the basis of Popper's solution of the problem.Comparisons between the 'Weberian' and the 'Popperian' conceptions of scientific objectivity are drawn.

Key concepts: Objectivity (philosophy), Epistemology, Engineering ethics, Data science, Computer science, Philosophy, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Scientific Objectivity: How is it Possible? — Research Paper | ScholarLens