2018Journal of Communication and Information SystemsOpen access

Two-radii 8APSK and Two-radii 16APSK Modulations as Alternatives to 8PSK and 16QAM

Dayan Guimarães

Open full text 9 citations

Abstract

In regard to the M-ary phase-shift keying (MPSK) modulation and the quadrature amplitude modulation (MQAM), MPSK is preferred up to M = 8, with MQAM being the most common choice for M > 8. In this letter, the modulations two-radii 8-ary and 16-ary amplitude-phase shift keying (APSK), respectively named 2r8APSK and 2r16APSK, are proposed as alternatives to 8PSK and square 16QAM, in this order. The 2r8APSK achieves higher power efficiency than the 8PSK, at the cost of a higher peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) and a slightly more complex receiver. The 2r16APSK yields lower PAPR than the 16QAM, with roughly the same receiver complexity, but at the cost of a slightly lower power efficiency. Comparisons with other APSK-based modulations are made as well.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In regard to the M-ary phase-shift keying (MPSK) modulation and the quadrature amplitude modulation (MQAM), MPSK is preferred up to M = 8, with MQAM being the most common choice for M > 8. In this letter, the modulations two-radii 8-ary and 16-ary amplitude-phase shift keying (APSK), respectively named 2r8APSK and 2r16APSK, are proposed as alternatives to 8PSK and square 16QAM, in this order. The 2r8APSK achieves higher power efficiency than the 8PSK, at the cost of a higher peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) and a slightly more complex receiver. The 2r16APSK yields lower PAPR than the 16QAM, with roughly the same receiver complexity, but at the cost of a slightly lower power efficiency. Comparisons with other APSK-based modulations are made as well.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In regard to the M-ary phase-shift keying (MPSK) modulation and the quadrature amplitude modulation (MQAM), MPSK is preferred up to M = 8, with MQAM being the most common choice for M > 8. In this letter, the modulations two-radii 8-ary and 16-ary amplitude-phase shift keying (APSK), respectively named 2r8APSK and 2r16APSK, are proposed as alternatives to 8PSK and square 16QAM, in this order. The 2r8APSK achieves higher power efficiency than the 8PSK, at the cost of a higher peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) and a slightly more complex receiver. The 2r16APSK yields lower PAPR than the 16QAM, with roughly the same receiver complexity, but at the cost of a slightly lower power efficiency. Comparisons with other APSK-based modulations are made as well.

Key concepts: Phase-shift keying, Amplitude and phase-shift keying, Quadrature amplitude modulation, Amplitude, Keying, Modulation (music), Amplitude modulation, Power (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Two-radii 8APSK and Two-radii 16APSK Modulations as Alternatives to 8PSK and 16QAM — Research Paper | ScholarLens