1997Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver)Open access

A Critique of the Yugoslavia War Crimes Tribunal

Michael P. Scharf

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

It is ironic that history has not been altogether kind to the Nuremberg Tribunal, labeling it victor's justice, denouncing its application of ex post facto law, and rebuking its procedural shortcomings. Fifty years later, the world community has created another war crimes tribunal - the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. In its first annual report, this new Tribunal stated that one can discern in the statute and the rules a conscious effort to avoid some of the often-mentioned flaws of Nuremberg and Tokyo. Because it will serve as the model for future ad hoc tribunals and a permanent international criminal court, the Yugoslav Tribunal has recognized that to achieve success it must not only be fair, but be seen as fair - a goal it has only partially achieved thus far.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is ironic that history has not been altogether kind to the Nuremberg Tribunal, labeling it victor's justice, denouncing its application of ex post facto law, and rebuking its procedural shortcomings. Fifty years later, the world community has created another war crimes tribunal - the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. In its first annual report, this new Tribunal stated that one can discern in the statute and the rules a conscious effort to avoid some of the often-mentioned flaws of Nuremberg and Tokyo. Because it will serve as the model for future ad hoc tribunals and a permanent international criminal court, the Yugoslav Tribunal has recognized that to achieve success it must not only be fair, but be seen as fair - a goal it has only partially achieved thus far.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is ironic that history has not been altogether kind to the Nuremberg Tribunal, labeling it victor's justice, denouncing its application of ex post facto law, and rebuking its procedural shortcomings. Fifty years later, the world community has created another war crimes tribunal - the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. In its first annual report, this new Tribunal stated that one can discern in the statute and the rules a conscious effort to avoid some of the often-mentioned flaws of Nuremberg and Tokyo. Because it will serve as the model for future ad hoc tribunals and a permanent international criminal court, the Yugoslav Tribunal has recognized that to achieve success it must not only be fair, but be seen as fair - a goal it has only partially achieved thus far.

Key concepts: Tribunal, Law, War crime, Political science, Genocide, Statute, Economic Justice, International community

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Critique of the Yugoslavia War Crimes Tribunal — Research Paper | ScholarLens