2018Journal of VisionOpen access

Individual differences in the use of form and motion in the perception of sex in biological motion displays.

Eric Hiris, William G. McLoughlin, Gaokhia Yang, Sean Conway

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Past research on individual differences in biological motion perception has used different tasks as a way of determining the relative use of form and motion information. However, a single task, the identification of the sex of a biological motion actor, can be based on form information, motion information, or both. We collected data from 76 observers completing a sex identification task to determine what information observers used to complete the task. In intermixed trials, participants viewed biological motion displays that varied in 1) both motion and form information, 2) just motion information, and 3) just form information. In addition to basic demographic information, participants also completed ADHD measures and surveys on autism, empathy, social anxiety, and the vividness of movement imagery. We analyzed the biological motion data by examining the slopes of logistic regression functions for the three types of biological motion displays. Observers were classified as using motion and form equally (18 observers), using motion more (31 observers), or using form more (27 observers). Performance on ADHD measures and survey scores for autism, empathy, and social anxiety were not correlated with performance on the biological motion tasks as measured by the slope of the logistic regression functions. There was a significant negative correlation between performance on the form only biological motion displays and vividness of movement imagery. Analysis of demographic data showed that females were more likely to be classified as "using form information more" or "using both motion and form about equally" while males were more likely to be classified as using "motion information more." These data show that there are individual differences on what information observers use to complete a sex identification task and these differences may in part be related to the sex of the observer and their visual movement imagery ability. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Past research on individual differences in biological motion perception has used different tasks as a way of determining the relative use of form and motion information. However, a single task, the identification of the sex of a biological motion actor, can be based on form information, motion information, or both. We collected data from 76 observers completing a sex identification task to determine what information observers used to complete the task. In intermixed trials, participants viewed biological motion displays that varied in 1) both motion and form information, 2) just motion information, and 3) just form information. In addition to basic demographic information, participants also completed ADHD measures and surveys on autism, empathy, social anxiety, and the vividness of movement imagery. We analyzed the biological motion data by examining the slopes of logistic regression functions for the three types of biological motion displays. Observers were classified as using motion and form equally (18 observers), using motion more (31 observers), or using form more (27 observers). Performance on ADHD measures and survey scores for autism, empathy, and social anxiety were not correlated with performance on the biological motion tasks as measured by the slope of the logistic regression functions. There was a significant negative correlation between performance on the form only biological motion displays and vividness of movement imagery. Analysis of demographic data showed that females were more likely to be classified as "using form information more" or "using both motion and form about equally" while males were more likely to be classified as using "motion information more." These data show that there are individual differences on what information observers use to complete a sex identification task and these differences may in part be related to the sex of the observer and their visual movement imagery ability. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Past research on individual differences in biological motion perception has used different tasks as a way of determining the relative use of form and motion information. However, a single task, the identification of the sex of a biological motion actor, can be based on form information, motion information, or both. We collected data from 76 observers completing a sex identification task to determine what information observers used to complete the task. In intermixed trials, participants viewed biological motion displays that varied in 1) both motion and form information, 2) just motion information, and 3) just form information. In addition to basic demographic information, participants also completed ADHD measures and surveys on autism, empathy, social anxiety, and the vividness of movement imagery. We analyzed the biological motion data by examining the slopes of logistic regression functions for the three types of biological motion displays. Observers were classified as using motion and form equally (18 observers), using motion more (31 observers), or using form more (27 observers). Performance on ADHD measures and survey scores for autism, empathy, and social anxiety were not correlated with performance on the biological motion tasks as measured by the slope of the logistic regression functions. There was a significant negative correlation between performance on the form only biological motion displays and vividness of movement imagery. Analysis of demographic data showed that females were more likely to be classified as "using form information more" or "using both motion and form about equally" while males were more likely to be classified as using "motion information more." These data show that there are individual differences on what information observers use to complete a sex identification task and these differences may in part be related to the sex of the observer and their visual movement imagery ability. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2018

Key concepts: Biological motion, Motion (physics), Psychology, Empathy, Perception, Motion perception, Task (project management), Cognitive psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Individual differences in the use of form and motion in the perception of sex in biological motion displays. — Research Paper | ScholarLens