The Sensitivity of Consumption to Transitory Income: Estimates from Panel Data on Households
Robert E. Hall, Frederic S. Mishkin
Abstract
Open-access reader
Robert E. Hall, Frederic S. Mishkin
Abstract
Open-access reader
We investigate the stochastic relation between income and consumption (specifically, consumption of food) within a panel of about 2,000 households.Our major findings are:1. Consumption responds much more strongly to permanent than to transitory movements of income.2. The response to transitory income is nonetheless clearly positive.3. A simple test, independent of our model of consumption, rejects a central implication of the pure life cycle-permanent income hypothesis.4. The observed covariation of income and consumption is compatible with pure life cycle-permanent income behavior on the part of 80 percent of families and simple proportionality of consumption and income among the remaining 20 percent.As a general matter, our findings support the view that families respond differently to different sources of income variations.In particular, temporary income tax policies have smaller effects on consumption than do other, more permanent changes in income of the same magnitude.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We investigate the stochastic relation between income and consumption (specifically, consumption of food) within a panel of about 2,000 households.Our major findings are:1. Consumption responds much more strongly to permanent than to transitory movements of income.2. The response to transitory income is nonetheless clearly positive.3. A simple test, independent of our model of consumption, rejects a central implication of the pure life cycle-permanent income hypothesis.4. The observed covariation of income and consumption is compatible with pure life cycle-permanent income behavior on the part of 80 percent of families and simple proportionality of consumption and income among the remaining 20 percent.As a general matter, our findings support the view that families respond differently to different sources of income variations.In particular, temporary income tax policies have smaller effects on consumption than do other, more permanent changes in income of the same magnitude.
Key concepts: Permanent income hypothesis, Economics, Consumption (sociology), Autonomous consumption, Income elasticity of demand, Demographic economics, Consumption function, Panel data