2001Journal of Political EconomyOpen access

Urban Decline and Durable Housing

Edward L. Glaeser, Joseph Gyourko

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

People continue to live in many big American cities, because in those cities housing costs less than new construction.While cities may lose their productive edge, their houses remain and population falls only when housing depreciates.This paper presents a simple durable housing model of urban decline with several implications which document: (1) urban growth rates are leptokurtotic --cities grow more quickly than they decline, (2) city growth rates are highly persistent, especially amount declining cities, (3) positive shocks increase population more than they increase housing prices, (4) negative shocks decrease housing prices more than they decrease population, (5) the relationship between changes in housing prices and changes in population is strongly concave, and (6) declining cities attract individuals with low levels of human capital.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

People continue to live in many big American cities, because in those cities housing costs less than new construction.While cities may lose their productive edge, their houses remain and population falls only when housing depreciates.This paper presents a simple durable housing model of urban decline with several implications which document: (1) urban growth rates are leptokurtotic --cities grow more quickly than they decline, (2) city growth rates are highly persistent, especially amount declining cities, (3) positive shocks increase population more than they increase housing prices, (4) negative shocks decrease housing prices more than they decrease population, (5) the relationship between changes in housing prices and changes in population is strongly concave, and (6) declining cities attract individuals with low levels of human capital.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

People continue to live in many big American cities, because in those cities housing costs less than new construction.While cities may lose their productive edge, their houses remain and population falls only when housing depreciates.This paper presents a simple durable housing model of urban decline with several implications which document: (1) urban growth rates are leptokurtotic --cities grow more quickly than they decline, (2) city growth rates are highly persistent, especially amount declining cities, (3) positive shocks increase population more than they increase housing prices, (4) negative shocks decrease housing prices more than they decrease population, (5) the relationship between changes in housing prices and changes in population is strongly concave, and (6) declining cities attract individuals with low levels of human capital.

Key concepts: Economics, Population, Population growth, Population decline, Capital (architecture), Demographic economics, Geography, Demography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Urban Decline and Durable Housing — Research Paper | ScholarLens