Changes in sperm banking rates within the first seven months of a formal male oncofertility program.
Diana M. Lopategui, Emad Ibrahim, Raphael L. Yechieli, Nancy L. Brackett, Ranjith Ramasamy
Abstract
Diana M. Lopategui, Emad Ibrahim, Raphael L. Yechieli, Nancy L. Brackett, Ranjith Ramasamy
Abstract
e21587 Background: Oncofertility counseling is an essential part of the care for cancer patients with risk of infertility. In June 2016, our institution formally initiated a standardized program for fertility preservation, including nursing and physician education. After the first 7 months of functioning, we here examine the sperm banking rates amongst male cancer patients, and its variation respect previous years. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of men newly diagnosed with cancer at our institution. We assessed the rates of sperm banking amongst this patient population before the implementation of a standardized fertility preservation program, and again after: from January 2011 to May 2016 and from June 2016 to December 2016, respectively. Results: Sperm banking rate amongst male cancer patients before the initiation of the program was 3.3% (30 out of 902 patients). Along the 7 months after initiation of the program, rate of fertility preservation increased 6.2 folds, up to 20.6% (21 out of 102). Patients undergoing sperm banking through the fertility preservation program were aged 14 to 62 years old; mean ± standard deviation = 25.9± 6.9 years. Two of the patients were minors under care of Pediatric Oncology department. 76.7% of the samples (17 patients) were obtained by masturbation. In the other 4 patients, viable sperm could not be preserved from ejaculation, but it was successfully obtained by testicular or epidydimal sperm extraction. Conclusions: The initiation of a formal fertility preservation program at our institution quickly increased the rate of sperm banking; in more than 6 folds within its first 7 months of functioning. Oncofertility is an essential component of the care of oncologic patients in reproductive age or younger, and our results manifest the benefit of a standardized program at academic institutions. Counseling in fertility preservation should be offered to all patients at risk prior to initiation of oncologic treatment.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
e21587 Background: Oncofertility counseling is an essential part of the care for cancer patients with risk of infertility. In June 2016, our institution formally initiated a standardized program for fertility preservation, including nursing and physician education. After the first 7 months of functioning, we here examine the sperm banking rates amongst male cancer patients, and its variation respect previous years. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of men newly diagnosed with cancer at our institution. We assessed the rates of sperm banking amongst this patient population before the implementation of a standardized fertility preservation program, and again after: from January 2011 to May 2016 and from June 2016 to December 2016, respectively. Results: Sperm banking rate amongst male cancer patients before the initiation of the program was 3.3% (30 out of 902 patients). Along the 7 months after initiation of the program, rate of fertility preservation increased 6.2 folds, up to 20.6% (21 out of 102). Patients undergoing sperm banking through the fertility preservation program were aged 14 to 62 years old; mean ± standard deviation = 25.9± 6.9 years. Two of the patients were minors under care of Pediatric Oncology department. 76.7% of the samples (17 patients) were obtained by masturbation. In the other 4 patients, viable sperm could not be preserved from ejaculation, but it was successfully obtained by testicular or epidydimal sperm extraction. Conclusions: The initiation of a formal fertility preservation program at our institution quickly increased the rate of sperm banking; in more than 6 folds within its first 7 months of functioning. Oncofertility is an essential component of the care of oncologic patients in reproductive age or younger, and our results manifest the benefit of a standardized program at academic institutions. Counseling in fertility preservation should be offered to all patients at risk prior to initiation of oncologic treatment.
Key concepts: Oncofertility, Medicine, Sperm bank, Fertility preservation, Fertility, Sperm, Infertility, Population