2018Journal of SociologyRequires access

Does part-time employment status really reduce time pressure?

Judy Rose, Belinda Hewitt

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Part-time employment rates are increasing in Australia, for both women and men. However, gendered patterns in part-time employment status are typically associated with mothers’, rather than fathers’, transition to parenthood. This study uses data from the 2006 Negotiating the Life Course survey to investigate whether part-time employment reduces time pressure for women compared to men, when temporal job quality is considered. Our results show that women employed in shorter part-time hours had better time pressure outcomes, overall and at work, than women employed in longer part-time hours. Yet findings show that a lack of access to temporal flexibility and irregular work schedules negatively impact time pressure outcomes for both men and women. We conclude that time pressure benefits gained from being employed part-time, may be diminished when there is poor temporal job quality.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Part-time employment rates are increasing in Australia, for both women and men. However, gendered patterns in part-time employment status are typically associated with mothers’, rather than fathers’, transition to parenthood. This study uses data from the 2006 Negotiating the Life Course survey to investigate whether part-time employment reduces time pressure for women compared to men, when temporal job quality is considered. Our results show that women employed in shorter part-time hours had better time pressure outcomes, overall and at work, than women employed in longer part-time hours. Yet findings show that a lack of access to temporal flexibility and irregular work schedules negatively impact time pressure outcomes for both men and women. We conclude that time pressure benefits gained from being employed part-time, may be diminished when there is poor temporal job quality.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Part-time employment rates are increasing in Australia, for both women and men. However, gendered patterns in part-time employment status are typically associated with mothers’, rather than fathers’, transition to parenthood. This study uses data from the 2006 Negotiating the Life Course survey to investigate whether part-time employment reduces time pressure for women compared to men, when temporal job quality is considered. Our results show that women employed in shorter part-time hours had better time pressure outcomes, overall and at work, than women employed in longer part-time hours. Yet findings show that a lack of access to temporal flexibility and irregular work schedules negatively impact time pressure outcomes for both men and women. We conclude that time pressure benefits gained from being employed part-time, may be diminished when there is poor temporal job quality.

Key concepts: Part-time employment, Time-use survey, Negotiation, Flexibility (engineering), Work time, Demographic economics, Work (physics), Time allocation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does part-time employment status really reduce time pressure? — Research Paper | ScholarLens