2018•IFAC-PapersOnLineOpen access

Resiliency, the Path to Safety II

Ondřej Baštán, Tomáš Benešl, Petr Fiedler

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

This paper attempts to summarize information related to ensuring system resilience across disciplines. The first part outlines the reasons why the security in current systems is inadequate, generating the need to deepen the knowledge of the second generation of safety (Safety II). The authors also compare the views on safety from the perspectives of the current methods and resilience. Further, the paper also discusses the basic features required for a resilient system and presents the ideal definition of such a system. The final analysis then characterizes the methods to be applied in ensuring the resilience of industrial systems; importantly, this section also provides an example of how the current security scenarios can fail in high complexity systems. In this context, the demands on an industrial resilient control system are outlined, together with how the second generation safety approaches differ from the previously applied concept.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper attempts to summarize information related to ensuring system resilience across disciplines. The first part outlines the reasons why the security in current systems is inadequate, generating the need to deepen the knowledge of the second generation of safety (Safety II). The authors also compare the views on safety from the perspectives of the current methods and resilience. Further, the paper also discusses the basic features required for a resilient system and presents the ideal definition of such a system. The final analysis then characterizes the methods to be applied in ensuring the resilience of industrial systems; importantly, this section also provides an example of how the current security scenarios can fail in high complexity systems. In this context, the demands on an industrial resilient control system are outlined, together with how the second generation safety approaches differ from the previously applied concept.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper attempts to summarize information related to ensuring system resilience across disciplines. The first part outlines the reasons why the security in current systems is inadequate, generating the need to deepen the knowledge of the second generation of safety (Safety II). The authors also compare the views on safety from the perspectives of the current methods and resilience. Further, the paper also discusses the basic features required for a resilient system and presents the ideal definition of such a system. The final analysis then characterizes the methods to be applied in ensuring the resilience of industrial systems; importantly, this section also provides an example of how the current security scenarios can fail in high complexity systems. In this context, the demands on an industrial resilient control system are outlined, together with how the second generation safety approaches differ from the previously applied concept.

Key concepts: Resilience (materials science), Risk analysis (engineering), Computer science, Context (archaeology), System safety, Ideal (ethics), Computer security, Process management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Resiliency, the Path to Safety II — Research Paper | ScholarLens