2018Duke Law Scholarship Repository (Duke University)Requires access

Amending the Amendment Procedures of Article V

Jason Mazzone

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Almost everyone has an idea about how to amend the U.S. Constitution so as to address a defect in our structures of government or to alter the roster of existing protections for individual rights. There is, however, little point in contemplating such amendments without first confronting the formidable hurdles of Article V. This Article, prepared for a symposium at Duke Law School at which participants were asked to propose a specific constitutional amendment, is thus directed at amending the amendment procedures of Article V itself. The amendment that this Article proposes requires periodically asking voters whether a constitutional convention should be held. Should voters approve holding a national convention, it would have power to propose amendments and state-level conventions would decide whether to ratify the proposals. The amendment this Article offers thus provides a means for constitutional change that does not depend upon either Congress or the state legislatures. The proposal also contains safeguards to ensure that any alterations to the Constitution reflect broad and sustained public support. Besides allowing for realistic consideration of constitutional reform, the proposal offers broad political and cultural benefits.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Almost everyone has an idea about how to amend the U.S. Constitution so as to address a defect in our structures of government or to alter the roster of existing protections for individual rights. There is, however, little point in contemplating such amendments without first confronting the formidable hurdles of Article V. This Article, prepared for a symposium at Duke Law School at which participants were asked to propose a specific constitutional amendment, is thus directed at amending the amendment procedures of Article V itself. The amendment that this Article proposes requires periodically asking voters whether a constitutional convention should be held. Should voters approve holding a national convention, it would have power to propose amendments and state-level conventions would decide whether to ratify the proposals. The amendment this Article offers thus provides a means for constitutional change that does not depend upon either Congress or the state legislatures. The proposal also contains safeguards to ensure that any alterations to the Constitution reflect broad and sustained public support. Besides allowing for realistic consideration of constitutional reform, the proposal offers broad political and cultural benefits.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Almost everyone has an idea about how to amend the U.S. Constitution so as to address a defect in our structures of government or to alter the roster of existing protections for individual rights. There is, however, little point in contemplating such amendments without first confronting the formidable hurdles of Article V. This Article, prepared for a symposium at Duke Law School at which participants were asked to propose a specific constitutional amendment, is thus directed at amending the amendment procedures of Article V itself. The amendment that this Article proposes requires periodically asking voters whether a constitutional convention should be held. Should voters approve holding a national convention, it would have power to propose amendments and state-level conventions would decide whether to ratify the proposals. The amendment this Article offers thus provides a means for constitutional change that does not depend upon either Congress or the state legislatures. The proposal also contains safeguards to ensure that any alterations to the Constitution reflect broad and sustained public support. Besides allowing for realistic consideration of constitutional reform, the proposal offers broad political and cultural benefits.

Key concepts: Constitution, Legislature, Law, Political science, State (computer science), Amendment, Constitutional amendment, Convention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Amending the Amendment Procedures of Article V — Research Paper | ScholarLens