2018•European Heart JournalRequires access

P1696Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on vascular dilator function in patient undergoing invasive coronary procedure

Edgardo Cristiano, Antonio De Vita, Angelo Villano, Erica Mencarelli, Veronica Melita, Laura Manfredonia, Alessandra Stazi, Antonio Bisignani, Gaetano Antonio Lanza, Filippo Crea

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Previous studies showed favorable effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on endothelial function. In this study we aimed to 1) assess the effects of RIPC on endothelial dysfunction induced by interventional coronary procedures; 2) evaluate whether these effects of RIPS might be different in patients with stable vs. unstable coronary syndromes; 3) investigate whether the effects of RIPC on procedure-induced endothelium dysfunction might be mediated by effects on subclinical inflammation. Methods: We studied 62 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography because of a suspect of stable angina (30 patients) or because of no-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) (32 patients). Patients were randomly assigned to undergo RIPC (3 short episodes of forearm ischemia, separated by 5 minutes of reperfusion) or sham RIPC (controls) immediately before the coronary procedure. Endothelium-dependent dilator function was assessed by flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). Endothelium-independent dilator function was assessed by nitrate-mediated dilatation (NMD). FMD and NMD were measured the day before the coronary procedure and 24 hours after the invasive procedure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Previous studies showed favorable effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on endothelial function. In this study we aimed to 1) assess the effects of RIPC on endothelial dysfunction induced by interventional coronary procedures; 2) evaluate whether these effects of RIPS might be different in patients with stable vs. unstable coronary syndromes; 3) investigate whether the effects of RIPC on procedure-induced endothelium dysfunction might be mediated by effects on subclinical inflammation. Methods: We studied 62 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography because of a suspect of stable angina (30 patients) or because of no-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) (32 patients). Patients were randomly assigned to undergo RIPC (3 short episodes of forearm ischemia, separated by 5 minutes of reperfusion) or sham RIPC (controls) immediately before the coronary procedure. Endothelium-dependent dilator function was assessed by flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). Endothelium-independent dilator function was assessed by nitrate-mediated dilatation (NMD). FMD and NMD were measured the day before the coronary procedure and 24 hours after the invasive procedure.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Previous studies showed favorable effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on endothelial function. In this study we aimed to 1) assess the effects of RIPC on endothelial dysfunction induced by interventional coronary procedures; 2) evaluate whether these effects of RIPS might be different in patients with stable vs. unstable coronary syndromes; 3) investigate whether the effects of RIPC on procedure-induced endothelium dysfunction might be mediated by effects on subclinical inflammation. Methods: We studied 62 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography because of a suspect of stable angina (30 patients) or because of no-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) (32 patients). Patients were randomly assigned to undergo RIPC (3 short episodes of forearm ischemia, separated by 5 minutes of reperfusion) or sham RIPC (controls) immediately before the coronary procedure. Endothelium-dependent dilator function was assessed by flow-mediated dilatation (FMD). Endothelium-independent dilator function was assessed by nitrate-mediated dilatation (NMD). FMD and NMD were measured the day before the coronary procedure and 24 hours after the invasive procedure.

Key concepts: Medicine, Dilator, Cardiology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
P1696Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on vascular dilator function in patient undergoing invasive coronary procedure — Research Paper | ScholarLens