2018•Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University)Open access

Judicial Mediation: From Debates to Renewal

Jean-François Roberge, Dorcas Quek Anderson

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

Judicial mediation involving a judge acting as a mediator in a court dispute has been implemented in many jurisdictions worldwide as a way to overcome access to justice challenges. This innovation has raised many debates on the changing role of the judge built on either its congruence with or divergence from judicial adjudication. Over the years, these debates have become increasingly stagnant. The evolving vision on access to justice brings an opportunity to draw from the earlier debates and forge a different way forward. This paper argues that a coequality approach to understanding judicial mediation is a better way to design the process in a way that respects the distinctive qualities of mediation and the justice system, and to create a renewed judicial mediation model. Based upon Singapore and Canada's strong commitment to access to justice and long-standing judicial mediation experiences, the paper proposes an "Integrative Judicial Mediation" model.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Judicial mediation involving a judge acting as a mediator in a court dispute has been implemented in many jurisdictions worldwide as a way to overcome access to justice challenges. This innovation has raised many debates on the changing role of the judge built on either its congruence with or divergence from judicial adjudication. Over the years, these debates have become increasingly stagnant. The evolving vision on access to justice brings an opportunity to draw from the earlier debates and forge a different way forward. This paper argues that a coequality approach to understanding judicial mediation is a better way to design the process in a way that respects the distinctive qualities of mediation and the justice system, and to create a renewed judicial mediation model. Based upon Singapore and Canada's strong commitment to access to justice and long-standing judicial mediation experiences, the paper proposes an "Integrative Judicial Mediation" model.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Judicial mediation involving a judge acting as a mediator in a court dispute has been implemented in many jurisdictions worldwide as a way to overcome access to justice challenges. This innovation has raised many debates on the changing role of the judge built on either its congruence with or divergence from judicial adjudication. Over the years, these debates have become increasingly stagnant. The evolving vision on access to justice brings an opportunity to draw from the earlier debates and forge a different way forward. This paper argues that a coequality approach to understanding judicial mediation is a better way to design the process in a way that respects the distinctive qualities of mediation and the justice system, and to create a renewed judicial mediation model. Based upon Singapore and Canada's strong commitment to access to justice and long-standing judicial mediation experiences, the paper proposes an "Integrative Judicial Mediation" model.

Key concepts: Mediation, Adjudication, Economic Justice, Political science, Lawyer supported mediation, Alternative dispute resolution, Party-directed mediation, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Judicial Mediation: From Debates to Renewal — Research Paper | ScholarLens