2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Clinical question: What are the effects of tobacco cessation interventions for young people?

Jane Burch, Sera Tort

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

When tobacco cessation interventions (individual or group counseling, technology‐based interventions, multicomponent interventions, Project EX, pharmacology) were compared with standard care or no tobacco cessation intervention controls, the only interventions to show clear benefit were group counseling (191 vs 142 per 1000 young people quit smoking) and Project EX (a complex theoretical construct including motivational interviewing, games for groups, education, anger management, yoga, weight control, meditation, assertiveness training, role play, and relapse prevention; absolute values not available). Evidence shows no clear differences between any other intervention and standard care/no intervention, but the quality of evidence for all comparisons when assessed was very low to low, and firm conclusions cannot be drawn regarding any tobacco cessation intervention. Adverse events were not assessed for most comparisons.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When tobacco cessation interventions (individual or group counseling, technology‐based interventions, multicomponent interventions, Project EX, pharmacology) were compared with standard care or no tobacco cessation intervention controls, the only interventions to show clear benefit were group counseling (191 vs 142 per 1000 young people quit smoking) and Project EX (a complex theoretical construct including motivational interviewing, games for groups, education, anger management, yoga, weight control, meditation, assertiveness training, role play, and relapse prevention; absolute values not available). Evidence shows no clear differences between any other intervention and standard care/no intervention, but the quality of evidence for all comparisons when assessed was very low to low, and firm conclusions cannot be drawn regarding any tobacco cessation intervention. Adverse events were not assessed for most comparisons.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When tobacco cessation interventions (individual or group counseling, technology‐based interventions, multicomponent interventions, Project EX, pharmacology) were compared with standard care or no tobacco cessation intervention controls, the only interventions to show clear benefit were group counseling (191 vs 142 per 1000 young people quit smoking) and Project EX (a complex theoretical construct including motivational interviewing, games for groups, education, anger management, yoga, weight control, meditation, assertiveness training, role play, and relapse prevention; absolute values not available). Evidence shows no clear differences between any other intervention and standard care/no intervention, but the quality of evidence for all comparisons when assessed was very low to low, and firm conclusions cannot be drawn regarding any tobacco cessation intervention. Adverse events were not assessed for most comparisons.

Key concepts: Motivational interviewing, Psychological intervention, Smoking cessation, Intervention (counseling), Medicine, Meditation, Anger, Assertiveness

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical question: What are the effects of tobacco cessation interventions for young people? — Research Paper | ScholarLens