2018Journal of Neuroendovascular TherapyOpen access

Carotid Artery Plaque Diagnosis Using CT

Kouichi Misaki, Naoyuki Uchiyama, Masanao Mohri, Mitsutoshi Nakada

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Carotid artery plaque diagnosis using CT is useful for detecting ulcer formation or calcified lesions through the spatial-resolution-based rearrangement of multiplanar images. Quantitative assessment, in which the plaque volume (mm3) is calculated, and qualitative assessment, in which plaque is classified into vulnerable or calcified plaque using the Hounsfield Unit (HU), are possible. Calcified plaque is clearly visualized on CT, with a high HU, and the grade of calcification can be evaluated. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for carotid artery stenosis with marked calcification may not lead to sufficient dilation, and CT is useful for preoperative assessment. On the other hand, vulnerable plaque may show a low HU, and fresh post-CAS infarction/restenosis more frequently appear when the volume of plaque with a low HU is larger. However, in the presence of a hematoma in the site of vulnerable plaque with a low HU, the HU may increase; therefore, qualitative assessment is limited. Furthermore, the limitations of CT include renal toxicity related to the use of contrast medium, radiation exposure, and artifacts. However, CT is more advantageous than MRI from the viewpoints of exposure-time shortening and availability in case of emergency.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Carotid artery plaque diagnosis using CT is useful for detecting ulcer formation or calcified lesions through the spatial-resolution-based rearrangement of multiplanar images. Quantitative assessment, in which the plaque volume (mm3) is calculated, and qualitative assessment, in which plaque is classified into vulnerable or calcified plaque using the Hounsfield Unit (HU), are possible. Calcified plaque is clearly visualized on CT, with a high HU, and the grade of calcification can be evaluated. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for carotid artery stenosis with marked calcification may not lead to sufficient dilation, and CT is useful for preoperative assessment. On the other hand, vulnerable plaque may show a low HU, and fresh post-CAS infarction/restenosis more frequently appear when the volume of plaque with a low HU is larger. However, in the presence of a hematoma in the site of vulnerable plaque with a low HU, the HU may increase; therefore, qualitative assessment is limited. Furthermore, the limitations of CT include renal toxicity related to the use of contrast medium, radiation exposure, and artifacts. However, CT is more advantageous than MRI from the viewpoints of exposure-time shortening and availability in case of emergency.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Carotid artery plaque diagnosis using CT is useful for detecting ulcer formation or calcified lesions through the spatial-resolution-based rearrangement of multiplanar images. Quantitative assessment, in which the plaque volume (mm3) is calculated, and qualitative assessment, in which plaque is classified into vulnerable or calcified plaque using the Hounsfield Unit (HU), are possible. Calcified plaque is clearly visualized on CT, with a high HU, and the grade of calcification can be evaluated. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) for carotid artery stenosis with marked calcification may not lead to sufficient dilation, and CT is useful for preoperative assessment. On the other hand, vulnerable plaque may show a low HU, and fresh post-CAS infarction/restenosis more frequently appear when the volume of plaque with a low HU is larger. However, in the presence of a hematoma in the site of vulnerable plaque with a low HU, the HU may increase; therefore, qualitative assessment is limited. Furthermore, the limitations of CT include renal toxicity related to the use of contrast medium, radiation exposure, and artifacts. However, CT is more advantageous than MRI from the viewpoints of exposure-time shortening and availability in case of emergency.

Key concepts: Medicine, Carotid arteries, Radiology, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Carotid Artery Plaque Diagnosis Using CT — Research Paper | ScholarLens