2018•International Journal of UrologyOpen access

Anticholinergic burden in the Japanese elderly population: Use of antimuscarinic medications for overactive bladder patients

Masaki Yoshida, Daisuke Kato, Takuya Nishimura, James Van Schyndle, Satoshi Uno, Tomomi Kimura

Open full text 33 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess anticholinergic use, especially the use of antimuscarinics, in the elderly (aged ≥65 years) Japanese overactive bladder and non-overactive bladder populations. METHODS: Patient records were sourced from a large, nationwide Japanese pharmacy claims database. Anticholinergic use on a random day in 2016 (index date) was investigated through the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale (primary scale), the Anticholinergic Drug Scale, the Anticholinergic Risk Scale and Beers criteria. The prevalence of anticholinergic use and anticholinergic scores at the index date were summarized descriptively. The overactive bladder population was defined as patients who had at least one prescription record for any antimuscarinic (fesoterodine, imidafenacin, oxybutynin, propiverine, solifenacin or tolterodine) or the β3-adrenoreceptor agonist, mirabegron, within the 1-year pre-index period. RESULTS: Among 1 216 126 outpatients, 35 138 (2.9%) were included in the overactive bladder group. In total, 112 (68.7%) of the anticholinergics listed in the scales were identified. In those who received any Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale-listed anticholinergic, the mean scores were higher in overactive bladder patients versus non-overactive bladder patients (3.2 ± 1.3 and 1.6 ± 1.1, respectively). Similarly, overactive bladder patients who received antimuscarinics had higher Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scores (3.3 ± 1.2) than patients who received mirabegron only (1.7 ± 1.1). In 58.8% of the overactive bladder patients, ≥80% of the total Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden score was exclusively attributable to antimuscarinics. CONCLUSIONS: Anticholinergic use was higher in overactive bladder patients versus non-overactive bladder patients. This increased use was largely attributable to antimuscarinics. The alternative use of mirabegron could therefore be considered to reduce the burden experienced by patients in Japan.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: To assess anticholinergic use, especially the use of antimuscarinics, in the elderly (aged ≥65 years) Japanese overactive bladder and non-overactive bladder populations. METHODS: Patient records were sourced from a large, nationwide Japanese pharmacy claims database. Anticholinergic use on a random day in 2016 (index date) was investigated through the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale (primary scale), the Anticholinergic Drug Scale, the Anticholinergic Risk Scale and Beers criteria. The prevalence of anticholinergic use and anticholinergic scores at the index date were summarized descriptively. The overactive bladder population was defined as patients who had at least one prescription record for any antimuscarinic (fesoterodine, imidafenacin, oxybutynin, propiverine, solifenacin or tolterodine) or the β3-adrenoreceptor agonist, mirabegron, within the 1-year pre-index period. RESULTS: Among 1 216 126 outpatients, 35 138 (2.9%) were included in the overactive bladder group. In total, 112 (68.7%) of the anticholinergics listed in the scales were identified. In those who received any Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale-listed anticholinergic, the mean scores were higher in overactive bladder patients versus non-overactive bladder patients (3.2 ± 1.3 and 1.6 ± 1.1, respectively). Similarly, overactive bladder patients who received antimuscarinics had higher Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scores (3.3 ± 1.2) than patients who received mirabegron only (1.7 ± 1.1). In 58.8% of the overactive bladder patients, ≥80% of the total Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden score was exclusively attributable to antimuscarinics. CONCLUSIONS: Anticholinergic use was higher in overactive bladder patients versus non-overactive bladder patients. This increased use was largely attributable to antimuscarinics. The alternative use of mirabegron could therefore be considered to reduce the burden experienced by patients in Japan.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess anticholinergic use, especially the use of antimuscarinics, in the elderly (aged ≥65 years) Japanese overactive bladder and non-overactive bladder populations. METHODS: Patient records were sourced from a large, nationwide Japanese pharmacy claims database. Anticholinergic use on a random day in 2016 (index date) was investigated through the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale (primary scale), the Anticholinergic Drug Scale, the Anticholinergic Risk Scale and Beers criteria. The prevalence of anticholinergic use and anticholinergic scores at the index date were summarized descriptively. The overactive bladder population was defined as patients who had at least one prescription record for any antimuscarinic (fesoterodine, imidafenacin, oxybutynin, propiverine, solifenacin or tolterodine) or the β3-adrenoreceptor agonist, mirabegron, within the 1-year pre-index period. RESULTS: Among 1 216 126 outpatients, 35 138 (2.9%) were included in the overactive bladder group. In total, 112 (68.7%) of the anticholinergics listed in the scales were identified. In those who received any Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale-listed anticholinergic, the mean scores were higher in overactive bladder patients versus non-overactive bladder patients (3.2 ± 1.3 and 1.6 ± 1.1, respectively). Similarly, overactive bladder patients who received antimuscarinics had higher Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scores (3.3 ± 1.2) than patients who received mirabegron only (1.7 ± 1.1). In 58.8% of the overactive bladder patients, ≥80% of the total Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden score was exclusively attributable to antimuscarinics. CONCLUSIONS: Anticholinergic use was higher in overactive bladder patients versus non-overactive bladder patients. This increased use was largely attributable to antimuscarinics. The alternative use of mirabegron could therefore be considered to reduce the burden experienced by patients in Japan.

Key concepts: Anticholinergic, Oxybutynin, Overactive bladder, Medicine, Tolterodine, Solifenacin, Urology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Anticholinergic burden in the Japanese elderly population: Use of antimuscarinic medications for overactive bladder patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens