Cross-Point Comparison of Multistage Non-Blocking Technologies
Muhammad Zulfin, Syafruddin Suherman, Rahmad Fauzi, Muhammad Razali, Maksum Pinem
Abstract
Open-access reader
Muhammad Zulfin, Syafruddin Suherman, Rahmad Fauzi, Muhammad Razali, Maksum Pinem
Abstract
Open-access reader
Multistage switching networks play important role in communication and computer network. They make communication nodes connect to each other. In computer hardware switches connect processors and memories. Initially, switches are arranged as one stage interconnection. As clients are growing, multistage is a must. The finding Clos multistage switching initiated multistage technologies. Benes improves Clos by reducing number of cross-points by using a 2 x 2 switch element and call re-routing. Batcher improves the technology by other way which is sorting destination address. Banyan is then joined to Batcher to simplify routing control. This paper analyses the number of cross-point required in Clos, Benes and Batcher Banyan to accomplish multistage switching architecture of 16, 64, 256, 1024 and 2048 input/output ports. As results, Clos cross-point is in averages 495.24% higher than Benes and 160.30% higher than Batcher Banyan. Clos blocking probabilities are closed to zero. Benes blocking probabilities are conditionally zero. Batcher Banyan blocking probabilities are zero.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Multistage switching networks play important role in communication and computer network. They make communication nodes connect to each other. In computer hardware switches connect processors and memories. Initially, switches are arranged as one stage interconnection. As clients are growing, multistage is a must. The finding Clos multistage switching initiated multistage technologies. Benes improves Clos by reducing number of cross-points by using a 2 x 2 switch element and call re-routing. Batcher improves the technology by other way which is sorting destination address. Banyan is then joined to Batcher to simplify routing control. This paper analyses the number of cross-point required in Clos, Benes and Batcher Banyan to accomplish multistage switching architecture of 16, 64, 256, 1024 and 2048 input/output ports. As results, Clos cross-point is in averages 495.24% higher than Benes and 160.30% higher than Batcher Banyan. Clos blocking probabilities are closed to zero. Benes blocking probabilities are conditionally zero. Batcher Banyan blocking probabilities are zero.
Key concepts: Clos network, Multistage interconnection networks, Banyan, Computer science, Blocking (statistics), Sorting, Routing (electronic design automation), Computer network