2015Unpublished venueRequires access

A Comparitive study between Apache II and Ranson Scoring Systems in predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis

G Kesavan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A comparitve study between APACHE II and RANSON scoring system in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis, is a prospective study of 33 cases of acute pancreatitis with the objective to compare the efficacy of APACHE II scoring system with RANSON scoring system in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. METHODS: 33 cases of acute pancreatitis admitted in Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital,were considered in the study .All patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis based on clinical suspicion and raised serum amylase levels were assessed with multiple variables of APACHE II and RANSON scoring system, the scores of which would indicate the severity of the disease and the scores were compared with raised serum amylase levels to know the efficacy of both the scoring systems. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (ppv) and negative predictive value (npv) of both scoring system in the present study was compared with the standard literature. RESULTS; The APACHE II scoring system had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 80%, positive predictive value (ppv) 62% and negative predictive value (npv) 100%. The RANSON scoring system had sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity 86.7%, positive predictive value (ppv) 33% and negative predictive value (npv) 96%. Area under curve (AUC) in APACHE II was 0.717 and in RANSON was 0.667. Of the 33 cases, 8 cases were considered severe pancreatitis of which all 8 were severe according to APACHE II but only 3 of the 8 were considered severe by RANSON score. There was no mortality in the study. Local and systemic complications were seen in patients considered severe by APACHE II score only. CONCLUSION: The APACHE II system takes into account all the major risk factors that influence outcome from disease, including the acute physiological derangements as well as patient ability to recover which may be diminished by advancing age or chronic disease. The range of APACHE II score is wide providing better spread between mild and severe attacks, because varying weights are assigned to increasingly abnormal values, rather than all or none judgements than RANSON scoring system. By the results obtained it can be concluded that APACHE II score is better than RANSON score in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A comparitve study between APACHE II and RANSON scoring system in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis, is a prospective study of 33 cases of acute pancreatitis with the objective to compare the efficacy of APACHE II scoring system with RANSON scoring system in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. METHODS: 33 cases of acute pancreatitis admitted in Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital,were considered in the study .All patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis based on clinical suspicion and raised serum amylase levels were assessed with multiple variables of APACHE II and RANSON scoring system, the scores of which would indicate the severity of the disease and the scores were compared with raised serum amylase levels to know the efficacy of both the scoring systems. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (ppv) and negative predictive value (npv) of both scoring system in the present study was compared with the standard literature. RESULTS; The APACHE II scoring system had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 80%, positive predictive value (ppv) 62% and negative predictive value (npv) 100%. The RANSON scoring system had sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity 86.7%, positive predictive value (ppv) 33% and negative predictive value (npv) 96%. Area under curve (AUC) in APACHE II was 0.717 and in RANSON was 0.667. Of the 33 cases, 8 cases were considered severe pancreatitis of which all 8 were severe according to APACHE II but only 3 of the 8 were considered severe by RANSON score. There was no mortality in the study. Local and systemic complications were seen in patients considered severe by APACHE II score only. CONCLUSION: The APACHE II system takes into account all the major risk factors that influence outcome from disease, including the acute physiological derangements as well as patient ability to recover which may be diminished by advancing age or chronic disease. The range of APACHE II score is wide providing better spread between mild and severe attacks, because varying weights are assigned to increasingly abnormal values, rather than all or none judgements than RANSON scoring system. By the results obtained it can be concluded that APACHE II score is better than RANSON score in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A comparitve study between APACHE II and RANSON scoring system in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis, is a prospective study of 33 cases of acute pancreatitis with the objective to compare the efficacy of APACHE II scoring system with RANSON scoring system in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. METHODS: 33 cases of acute pancreatitis admitted in Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital,were considered in the study .All patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis based on clinical suspicion and raised serum amylase levels were assessed with multiple variables of APACHE II and RANSON scoring system, the scores of which would indicate the severity of the disease and the scores were compared with raised serum amylase levels to know the efficacy of both the scoring systems. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (ppv) and negative predictive value (npv) of both scoring system in the present study was compared with the standard literature. RESULTS; The APACHE II scoring system had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 80%, positive predictive value (ppv) 62% and negative predictive value (npv) 100%. The RANSON scoring system had sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity 86.7%, positive predictive value (ppv) 33% and negative predictive value (npv) 96%. Area under curve (AUC) in APACHE II was 0.717 and in RANSON was 0.667. Of the 33 cases, 8 cases were considered severe pancreatitis of which all 8 were severe according to APACHE II but only 3 of the 8 were considered severe by RANSON score. There was no mortality in the study. Local and systemic complications were seen in patients considered severe by APACHE II score only. CONCLUSION: The APACHE II system takes into account all the major risk factors that influence outcome from disease, including the acute physiological derangements as well as patient ability to recover which may be diminished by advancing age or chronic disease. The range of APACHE II score is wide providing better spread between mild and severe attacks, because varying weights are assigned to increasingly abnormal values, rather than all or none judgements than RANSON scoring system. By the results obtained it can be concluded that APACHE II score is better than RANSON score in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis.

Key concepts: Acute pancreatitis, Medicine, APACHE II, Predictive value, Pancreatitis, Scoring system, Internal medicine, Severity of illness

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Comparitive study between Apache II and Ranson Scoring Systems in predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis — Research Paper | ScholarLens