Always-on fandom, Waiting and Bingeing
Matt Hills
Abstract
Matt Hills
Abstract
This chapter considers how psychoanalysis can illuminate the ordinary, everyday experiences of being a fan. It argues that othering and aggression between different fan communities/groups has become more central in the digital age. Fandom becomes both intimately personalized and other-directed at the same time, resulting in an intensified and performative "authenticity-as-excess," which though it has a longer cultural history, becomes especially marked via social media. Fan studies has tended to stress fandom&s;s "textual productivity" and textual creativity, frequently focusing on fan fiction to pay off these arguments about, and valorizations of, fandom. Fans are filling in time together, cooperating in sustaining their fan-cultural ontological security, and reassuring one another that this waiting can be endured without diminishing their fandom. Louisa Stein has rightly described much contemporary fandom as a kind of "feels culture": Millennial fans often tout emotional response – or what is known in millennial culture as "feels" – as a driving force behind their creative authorship communities.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter considers how psychoanalysis can illuminate the ordinary, everyday experiences of being a fan. It argues that othering and aggression between different fan communities/groups has become more central in the digital age. Fandom becomes both intimately personalized and other-directed at the same time, resulting in an intensified and performative "authenticity-as-excess," which though it has a longer cultural history, becomes especially marked via social media. Fan studies has tended to stress fandom&s;s "textual productivity" and textual creativity, frequently focusing on fan fiction to pay off these arguments about, and valorizations of, fandom. Fans are filling in time together, cooperating in sustaining their fan-cultural ontological security, and reassuring one another that this waiting can be endured without diminishing their fandom. Louisa Stein has rightly described much contemporary fandom as a kind of "feels culture": Millennial fans often tout emotional response – or what is known in millennial culture as "feels" – as a driving force behind their creative authorship communities.
Key concepts: Fandom, Psychology, Sociology, Media studies