2010ROSA POpen access

Review of the transportation planning process in the Pittsburgh metropolitan area

William Lyons, Paul Shadle, Beth Deysher, R Jensen-Fisher, Fred Ducca, Frederick Salvucci

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

This report is the fourth in a series produced for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) by the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center). This formal, comprehensive review conducted by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) headquarters and regional staff, with input from state, and local transportation entities, takes the place of the review of the Pittsburgh metropolitan planning organization (MPO) which otherwise would have been conducted by FHWA field and FTA regional staff. The Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission (SPRPC) conducts a competently managed and organized continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive (3-C) planning process, produces adequate planning products, and uses acceptable planning tools. Efforts are being made to implement a multi-modal planning approach, and the transit operator is involved in the process. The federal review team, however, has made a series of observations and suggestions on each segment of the planning process. These findings are intended to improve a competent process, and to provide guidance on addressing the ISTEA planning requirements.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report is the fourth in a series produced for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) by the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center). This formal, comprehensive review conducted by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) headquarters and regional staff, with input from state, and local transportation entities, takes the place of the review of the Pittsburgh metropolitan planning organization (MPO) which otherwise would have been conducted by FHWA field and FTA regional staff. The Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission (SPRPC) conducts a competently managed and organized continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive (3-C) planning process, produces adequate planning products, and uses acceptable planning tools. Efforts are being made to implement a multi-modal planning approach, and the transit operator is involved in the process. The federal review team, however, has made a series of observations and suggestions on each segment of the planning process. These findings are intended to improve a competent process, and to provide guidance on addressing the ISTEA planning requirements.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report is the fourth in a series produced for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) by the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center). This formal, comprehensive review conducted by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) headquarters and regional staff, with input from state, and local transportation entities, takes the place of the review of the Pittsburgh metropolitan planning organization (MPO) which otherwise would have been conducted by FHWA field and FTA regional staff. The Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission (SPRPC) conducts a competently managed and organized continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive (3-C) planning process, produces adequate planning products, and uses acceptable planning tools. Efforts are being made to implement a multi-modal planning approach, and the transit operator is involved in the process. The federal review team, however, has made a series of observations and suggestions on each segment of the planning process. These findings are intended to improve a competent process, and to provide guidance on addressing the ISTEA planning requirements.

Key concepts: Metropolitan area, Process (computing), Transportation planning, Transport engineering, Regional science, Business, Engineering, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Review of the transportation planning process in the Pittsburgh metropolitan area — Research Paper | ScholarLens