2018Odesa National University Herald JurisprudenceOpen access

USUCAPION AND SUCCESSION: THE QUESTIONS OF THE THEORY AND PRACTICE

Є. О. Рябоконь

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The paper deals with the disputable issues of applying usucapion to legal relations arising in connection with the succession in the possession of property. The author gives a critical assessment of the statements of scientists who qualify the usucapion possession not as an actual state, but as a subjective civil right, namely as a result of extending to ownership a legal succession according to the Part 2 of Art. 344 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. On the basis of an analysis of the Roman private law sources, there are refuted opinions on the attribution of usucapion possession to the number of subjective rights. It is stated that the necessary condition for the possession of a legal successor under Art. 344 of the Civil Code of Ukraine is being bona fide at the moment of acquisition of property.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper deals with the disputable issues of applying usucapion to legal relations arising in connection with the succession in the possession of property. The author gives a critical assessment of the statements of scientists who qualify the usucapion possession not as an actual state, but as a subjective civil right, namely as a result of extending to ownership a legal succession according to the Part 2 of Art. 344 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. On the basis of an analysis of the Roman private law sources, there are refuted opinions on the attribution of usucapion possession to the number of subjective rights. It is stated that the necessary condition for the possession of a legal successor under Art. 344 of the Civil Code of Ukraine is being bona fide at the moment of acquisition of property.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper deals with the disputable issues of applying usucapion to legal relations arising in connection with the succession in the possession of property. The author gives a critical assessment of the statements of scientists who qualify the usucapion possession not as an actual state, but as a subjective civil right, namely as a result of extending to ownership a legal succession according to the Part 2 of Art. 344 of the Civil Code of Ukraine. On the basis of an analysis of the Roman private law sources, there are refuted opinions on the attribution of usucapion possession to the number of subjective rights. It is stated that the necessary condition for the possession of a legal successor under Art. 344 of the Civil Code of Ukraine is being bona fide at the moment of acquisition of property.

Key concepts: Possession (linguistics), Successor cardinal, Civil code, Ecological succession, Attribution, Property (philosophy), Law, Adverse possession

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
USUCAPION AND SUCCESSION: THE QUESTIONS OF THE THEORY AND PRACTICE — Research Paper | ScholarLens