2018•Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and VenereologyOpen access

Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy

Katarína Kieselová, Felicidade Santiago, Martinha Henrique

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Phototherapy has long been recognized as beneficial for psoriasis treatment, with a favorable risk- -benefit relation. Photochemotherapy comprises the use of psoralen, either orally (oral PUVA) or topically (bath PUVA), prior to UVA irradiation. Oral administration of psoralen may lead to short or long-term side effects. Bath PUVA is particularly useful to minimize systemic toxicity and psoralen side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two PUVA modalities.Material and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis treated with PUVA therapy (oral and bath) in our dermatology department, between January 2001 and December 2016.Results: We performed 81 treatments with oral PUVA and 38 treatments with bath PUVA, in 68 and 26 patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 50,6 years. Oral PUVA group achieved PASI 75 in 68 cases (89.5%), and bath PUVA group in 26 (74.3%), with p-value=0 .05. The mean total dose needed to achieve PASI 75 in the oral PUVA group was 113.1 J/cm2 and in the bath PUVA group was 69.8 J/cm2. The mean number of sessions performed to achieve remission in the oral PUVA group was 23.31, and in the bath PUVA group was 17.58.Conclusion: Despite requiring specialized equipment and being more time consuming, bath PUVA represents one of the most effective therapies available for psoriasis and it should be considered as a treatment option for patients who are not candidates for systemic treatment.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: Phototherapy has long been recognized as beneficial for psoriasis treatment, with a favorable risk- -benefit relation. Photochemotherapy comprises the use of psoralen, either orally (oral PUVA) or topically (bath PUVA), prior to UVA irradiation. Oral administration of psoralen may lead to short or long-term side effects. Bath PUVA is particularly useful to minimize systemic toxicity and psoralen side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two PUVA modalities.Material and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis treated with PUVA therapy (oral and bath) in our dermatology department, between January 2001 and December 2016.Results: We performed 81 treatments with oral PUVA and 38 treatments with bath PUVA, in 68 and 26 patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 50,6 years. Oral PUVA group achieved PASI 75 in 68 cases (89.5%), and bath PUVA group in 26 (74.3%), with p-value=0 .05. The mean total dose needed to achieve PASI 75 in the oral PUVA group was 113.1 J/cm2 and in the bath PUVA group was 69.8 J/cm2. The mean number of sessions performed to achieve remission in the oral PUVA group was 23.31, and in the bath PUVA group was 17.58.Conclusion: Despite requiring specialized equipment and being more time consuming, bath PUVA represents one of the most effective therapies available for psoriasis and it should be considered as a treatment option for patients who are not candidates for systemic treatment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: Phototherapy has long been recognized as beneficial for psoriasis treatment, with a favorable risk- -benefit relation. Photochemotherapy comprises the use of psoralen, either orally (oral PUVA) or topically (bath PUVA), prior to UVA irradiation. Oral administration of psoralen may lead to short or long-term side effects. Bath PUVA is particularly useful to minimize systemic toxicity and psoralen side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two PUVA modalities.Material and Methods: A retrospective review of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis treated with PUVA therapy (oral and bath) in our dermatology department, between January 2001 and December 2016.Results: We performed 81 treatments with oral PUVA and 38 treatments with bath PUVA, in 68 and 26 patients, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 50,6 years. Oral PUVA group achieved PASI 75 in 68 cases (89.5%), and bath PUVA group in 26 (74.3%), with p-value=0 .05. The mean total dose needed to achieve PASI 75 in the oral PUVA group was 113.1 J/cm2 and in the bath PUVA group was 69.8 J/cm2. The mean number of sessions performed to achieve remission in the oral PUVA group was 23.31, and in the bath PUVA group was 17.58.Conclusion: Despite requiring specialized equipment and being more time consuming, bath PUVA represents one of the most effective therapies available for psoriasis and it should be considered as a treatment option for patients who are not candidates for systemic treatment.

Key concepts: Psoralen, Psoriasis, PUVA therapy, Medicine, Dermatology, Plaque psoriasis, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, DNA

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Oral PUVA Versus Bath PUVA in Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: A Comparative Study of Efficacy — Research Paper | ScholarLens