2007Environmental Engineering and Management JournalOpen access

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT: THE MUNICIPALITY'S POINT-OF-VIEW

Konstantinia Tsilemou, Demetrios Panagiotakopoulos

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

The objective of the paper is to present sustainability indicators for municipal solid waste management (MSWM).Sustainability implies environmental, economic and social acceptance.The complexity of the system-in-focus requires the employment of a systems (or cybernetic) approach: Acceptance implies clear objectives, from a specific point of view (here, the viewpoint of the municipal administration is taken), over a time horizon covering at least two generations, a life-cycle consideration, clear evaluation criteria for alternative MSWM systems, and finally specific and measurable indicators of the degree to which the objectives have been met.In this paper, a number of specific environmental indicators (abiotic depletion, human toxicity, global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photo-oxidant formation, etc.), economic indicators (cost per ton or per household or per person, revenue from recovered material and energy, MSWM system cost as % of GNP of the city, diversion between revenue and expenditures for MSWM, cost per capita as % of minimum wage, subsidies per person) and social indicators (odor, visual impact, comfort, required or used-up space, noise, system complexity, employment quality, etc.) are suggested for measuring the performance of municipal SWM systems.Specific real application is mentioned for a Greek city.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of the paper is to present sustainability indicators for municipal solid waste management (MSWM).Sustainability implies environmental, economic and social acceptance.The complexity of the system-in-focus requires the employment of a systems (or cybernetic) approach: Acceptance implies clear objectives, from a specific point of view (here, the viewpoint of the municipal administration is taken), over a time horizon covering at least two generations, a life-cycle consideration, clear evaluation criteria for alternative MSWM systems, and finally specific and measurable indicators of the degree to which the objectives have been met.In this paper, a number of specific environmental indicators (abiotic depletion, human toxicity, global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photo-oxidant formation, etc.), economic indicators (cost per ton or per household or per person, revenue from recovered material and energy, MSWM system cost as % of GNP of the city, diversion between revenue and expenditures for MSWM, cost per capita as % of minimum wage, subsidies per person) and social indicators (odor, visual impact, comfort, required or used-up space, noise, system complexity, employment quality, etc.) are suggested for measuring the performance of municipal SWM systems.Specific real application is mentioned for a Greek city.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of the paper is to present sustainability indicators for municipal solid waste management (MSWM).Sustainability implies environmental, economic and social acceptance.The complexity of the system-in-focus requires the employment of a systems (or cybernetic) approach: Acceptance implies clear objectives, from a specific point of view (here, the viewpoint of the municipal administration is taken), over a time horizon covering at least two generations, a life-cycle consideration, clear evaluation criteria for alternative MSWM systems, and finally specific and measurable indicators of the degree to which the objectives have been met.In this paper, a number of specific environmental indicators (abiotic depletion, human toxicity, global warming, acidification, eutrophication, photo-oxidant formation, etc.), economic indicators (cost per ton or per household or per person, revenue from recovered material and energy, MSWM system cost as % of GNP of the city, diversion between revenue and expenditures for MSWM, cost per capita as % of minimum wage, subsidies per person) and social indicators (odor, visual impact, comfort, required or used-up space, noise, system complexity, employment quality, etc.) are suggested for measuring the performance of municipal SWM systems.Specific real application is mentioned for a Greek city.

Key concepts: Solid waste management, Environmental planning, Point (geometry), Business, Waste management, Municipal solid waste, Environmental science, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ASSESSMENT: THE MUNICIPALITY'S POINT-OF-VIEW — Research Paper | ScholarLens