2018Science and Technology for the Built EnvironmentRequires access

Comparison of ASHRAE peak cooling load calculation methods

Chunliu Mao, Juan-Carlos Baltazar, J. S. Haberl

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

The building peak cooling load calculation is one of the fundamental steps to develop a proper whole-building HVAC system design. The accuracy of the calculation not only impacts the system size but also influences the building’s performance over the long run since oversized or undersized HVAC systems can exhibit less than optimal operation. Therefore, an accurate, easy-to-use method has been a goal for more than 60 years in the United States. To date, ASHRAE has published five methods for determining building peak cooling loads, including the total equivalent temperature difference/time averaging (TETD/TA) method, the transfer function method (TFM), the cooling load temperature difference/solar cooling load/cooling load factor (CLTD/SCL/CLF) method, the heat balance method (HBM), and the radiant time series method (RTSM). This article presents the results of a comprehensive comparison of these building peak cooling load calculation methods with a focus on the sensible building envelope cooling loads. The results show that the HBM is the most accurate method, followed by the RTSM, the TFM, the TETD/TA method, and the CLTD/SCL/CLF method.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The building peak cooling load calculation is one of the fundamental steps to develop a proper whole-building HVAC system design. The accuracy of the calculation not only impacts the system size but also influences the building’s performance over the long run since oversized or undersized HVAC systems can exhibit less than optimal operation. Therefore, an accurate, easy-to-use method has been a goal for more than 60 years in the United States. To date, ASHRAE has published five methods for determining building peak cooling loads, including the total equivalent temperature difference/time averaging (TETD/TA) method, the transfer function method (TFM), the cooling load temperature difference/solar cooling load/cooling load factor (CLTD/SCL/CLF) method, the heat balance method (HBM), and the radiant time series method (RTSM). This article presents the results of a comprehensive comparison of these building peak cooling load calculation methods with a focus on the sensible building envelope cooling loads. The results show that the HBM is the most accurate method, followed by the RTSM, the TFM, the TETD/TA method, and the CLTD/SCL/CLF method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The building peak cooling load calculation is one of the fundamental steps to develop a proper whole-building HVAC system design. The accuracy of the calculation not only impacts the system size but also influences the building’s performance over the long run since oversized or undersized HVAC systems can exhibit less than optimal operation. Therefore, an accurate, easy-to-use method has been a goal for more than 60 years in the United States. To date, ASHRAE has published five methods for determining building peak cooling loads, including the total equivalent temperature difference/time averaging (TETD/TA) method, the transfer function method (TFM), the cooling load temperature difference/solar cooling load/cooling load factor (CLTD/SCL/CLF) method, the heat balance method (HBM), and the radiant time series method (RTSM). This article presents the results of a comprehensive comparison of these building peak cooling load calculation methods with a focus on the sensible building envelope cooling loads. The results show that the HBM is the most accurate method, followed by the RTSM, the TFM, the TETD/TA method, and the CLTD/SCL/CLF method.

Key concepts: ASHRAE 90.1, Cooling load, HVAC, Building envelope, Envelope (radar), Air conditioning, Passive cooling, Cooling capacity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of ASHRAE peak cooling load calculation methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens