2018MycosesRequires access

Identification of Mucorales in patients with proven invasive mucormycosis by polymerase chain reaction in tissue samples

Nahid Gholinejad‐Ghadi, Tahereh Shokohi, Zahra Seifi, Seyed Reza Âghili, Emmanuel Roilides, Mehdi Nikkhah, Rostam Pormosa, Hossein Karami, Laleh Vahedi Larjani, Maryam Ghasemi, Iman Haghani

Open publisher page 41 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of mucormycosis, a life-threatening fungal infection, remains a challenge for physicians. OBJECTIVES: To identify the causative Mucorales in fresh clinical samples and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of patients with proven mucormycosis by molecular method. PATIENTS/METHODS: Fresh clinical samples of patients with proven mucormycosis according to the EORTC/MSG criteria admitted between 2015 and 2017 and histopathologically proven FFPE archives collected during 2004-2007 and 2015-2017 from Mazandaran University-affiliated hospitals of northern Iran were included. Seminested PCR targeting the 18S rDNA of Mucorales and ITS region was performed, and PCR products were then sequenced. RESULTS: While culture was positive only in 5 of 9 (56%) of fresh specimen cases, PCR was positive in all 9 (100%) histologically proven mucormycosis. Ten of 18 (56%) FFPE samples were PCR-positive. Overall, Mucorales PCR was positive in 19 of 27 (70%) samples. Mucorales species were Rhizopus arrhizus in 16 (84%) cases, R. arrhizus/Amylomyces rouxii in 2 (10.5%) cases and Rhizopus stolonifer in one case (5.5%). Among 27 mucormycosis cases, 25 (93%) cases were rhinocerebral, and 2 (7%) cases were disseminated. Diabetes mellitus (74%) and neutropaenia (63%) were the main risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Seminested PCR targeting 18S rDNA region of Mucorales is useful for identification of the causative agents of mucormycosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of mucormycosis, a life-threatening fungal infection, remains a challenge for physicians. OBJECTIVES: To identify the causative Mucorales in fresh clinical samples and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of patients with proven mucormycosis by molecular method. PATIENTS/METHODS: Fresh clinical samples of patients with proven mucormycosis according to the EORTC/MSG criteria admitted between 2015 and 2017 and histopathologically proven FFPE archives collected during 2004-2007 and 2015-2017 from Mazandaran University-affiliated hospitals of northern Iran were included. Seminested PCR targeting the 18S rDNA of Mucorales and ITS region was performed, and PCR products were then sequenced. RESULTS: While culture was positive only in 5 of 9 (56%) of fresh specimen cases, PCR was positive in all 9 (100%) histologically proven mucormycosis. Ten of 18 (56%) FFPE samples were PCR-positive. Overall, Mucorales PCR was positive in 19 of 27 (70%) samples. Mucorales species were Rhizopus arrhizus in 16 (84%) cases, R. arrhizus/Amylomyces rouxii in 2 (10.5%) cases and Rhizopus stolonifer in one case (5.5%). Among 27 mucormycosis cases, 25 (93%) cases were rhinocerebral, and 2 (7%) cases were disseminated. Diabetes mellitus (74%) and neutropaenia (63%) were the main risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Seminested PCR targeting 18S rDNA region of Mucorales is useful for identification of the causative agents of mucormycosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 41 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate diagnosis of mucormycosis, a life-threatening fungal infection, remains a challenge for physicians. OBJECTIVES: To identify the causative Mucorales in fresh clinical samples and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of patients with proven mucormycosis by molecular method. PATIENTS/METHODS: Fresh clinical samples of patients with proven mucormycosis according to the EORTC/MSG criteria admitted between 2015 and 2017 and histopathologically proven FFPE archives collected during 2004-2007 and 2015-2017 from Mazandaran University-affiliated hospitals of northern Iran were included. Seminested PCR targeting the 18S rDNA of Mucorales and ITS region was performed, and PCR products were then sequenced. RESULTS: While culture was positive only in 5 of 9 (56%) of fresh specimen cases, PCR was positive in all 9 (100%) histologically proven mucormycosis. Ten of 18 (56%) FFPE samples were PCR-positive. Overall, Mucorales PCR was positive in 19 of 27 (70%) samples. Mucorales species were Rhizopus arrhizus in 16 (84%) cases, R. arrhizus/Amylomyces rouxii in 2 (10.5%) cases and Rhizopus stolonifer in one case (5.5%). Among 27 mucormycosis cases, 25 (93%) cases were rhinocerebral, and 2 (7%) cases were disseminated. Diabetes mellitus (74%) and neutropaenia (63%) were the main risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Seminested PCR targeting 18S rDNA region of Mucorales is useful for identification of the causative agents of mucormycosis.

Key concepts: Mucorales, Mucormycosis, Rhizopus arrhizus, Polymerase chain reaction, Biology, Rhizopus, Pathology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Identification of Mucorales in patients with proven invasive mucormycosis by polymerase chain reaction in tissue samples — Research Paper | ScholarLens