2018•Epistemology & Philosophy of ScienceOpen access

The challenge to consensus: the relevance of the Lakatos-Feyerabend debate for contemporary science and technology studies

William T. Lynch

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Responding to comments on “Imre Lakatos and the Inexhaustible Atom: the Hidden Marxist Roots of History and Philosophy of Science,” an argument is made for reviving a missed opportunity for integrating sociological and normative approaches to science. Lakatos’ mature philosophy of science, though jettisoning a political commitment to Marxism, retains a dialectical approach developed during his Hungarian career. Through his carefully crafted debate with Feyerabend, Lakatos continued to promote a dialectical approach that offers a useful model for integrating the history of science and normative assessments focused on the viability of approaches that challenge dominant perspectives.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Responding to comments on “Imre Lakatos and the Inexhaustible Atom: the Hidden Marxist Roots of History and Philosophy of Science,” an argument is made for reviving a missed opportunity for integrating sociological and normative approaches to science. Lakatos’ mature philosophy of science, though jettisoning a political commitment to Marxism, retains a dialectical approach developed during his Hungarian career. Through his carefully crafted debate with Feyerabend, Lakatos continued to promote a dialectical approach that offers a useful model for integrating the history of science and normative assessments focused on the viability of approaches that challenge dominant perspectives.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Responding to comments on “Imre Lakatos and the Inexhaustible Atom: the Hidden Marxist Roots of History and Philosophy of Science,” an argument is made for reviving a missed opportunity for integrating sociological and normative approaches to science. Lakatos’ mature philosophy of science, though jettisoning a political commitment to Marxism, retains a dialectical approach developed during his Hungarian career. Through his carefully crafted debate with Feyerabend, Lakatos continued to promote a dialectical approach that offers a useful model for integrating the history of science and normative assessments focused on the viability of approaches that challenge dominant perspectives.

Key concepts: Relevance (law), Epistemology, Sociology, Engineering ethics, Data science, Philosophy, Computer science, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The challenge to consensus: the relevance of the Lakatos-Feyerabend debate for contemporary science and technology studies — Research Paper | ScholarLens