1986Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Requires access

Environmental and Water Quality Operational Studies: Size Distribution of Planktonic Autotrophy and Microheterotrophy in DeGray and West Point Reservoirs: A Comparative Study.

Bruce L. Kimmel, Alan W. Groeger

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Planktonic autotrophy in both reservoirs was dominated by microalgae, with usually 60% of the total photosynthetic carbon uptake associated with organisms in the 8.0-micrometer size fraction. Microheterotrophic activity in the 0.2- to 1.0-micrometer size fraction fraction (indicative of small, free-living bacterioplankton rather than of large bacteria or bacteria attached to suspended particles) usually accounted for 80% of the planktonic microheterotrophy. Relative to marked uplake-to-downlake gradients in physical and chemical conditions, size distributions of autotrophy and microheterotrophy were remarkably uniform in both reservoirs. Uplake-to-downlake shifts in size distributions appear to correspond to within-reservoir transitions from riverine to lacustrine conditions; however, the specific environmental factors controlling the size distributions of planktonic autotrophy and microheterotrophy ramain uncertain. Our results suggest that additional ecological factors (e.g., size-selective losses of cells by grazing and/or sinking, autotroph-microheterotroph interactions) must be considered, in addition to the availability of nutrients and suspended particles, as potential environment controls on the size distributions of planktonic autotrophy and microheterotrophy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Planktonic autotrophy in both reservoirs was dominated by microalgae, with usually 60% of the total photosynthetic carbon uptake associated with organisms in the 8.0-micrometer size fraction. Microheterotrophic activity in the 0.2- to 1.0-micrometer size fraction fraction (indicative of small, free-living bacterioplankton rather than of large bacteria or bacteria attached to suspended particles) usually accounted for 80% of the planktonic microheterotrophy. Relative to marked uplake-to-downlake gradients in physical and chemical conditions, size distributions of autotrophy and microheterotrophy were remarkably uniform in both reservoirs. Uplake-to-downlake shifts in size distributions appear to correspond to within-reservoir transitions from riverine to lacustrine conditions; however, the specific environmental factors controlling the size distributions of planktonic autotrophy and microheterotrophy ramain uncertain. Our results suggest that additional ecological factors (e.g., size-selective losses of cells by grazing and/or sinking, autotroph-microheterotroph interactions) must be considered, in addition to the availability of nutrients and suspended particles, as potential environment controls on the size distributions of planktonic autotrophy and microheterotrophy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Planktonic autotrophy in both reservoirs was dominated by microalgae, with usually 60% of the total photosynthetic carbon uptake associated with organisms in the 8.0-micrometer size fraction. Microheterotrophic activity in the 0.2- to 1.0-micrometer size fraction fraction (indicative of small, free-living bacterioplankton rather than of large bacteria or bacteria attached to suspended particles) usually accounted for 80% of the planktonic microheterotrophy. Relative to marked uplake-to-downlake gradients in physical and chemical conditions, size distributions of autotrophy and microheterotrophy were remarkably uniform in both reservoirs. Uplake-to-downlake shifts in size distributions appear to correspond to within-reservoir transitions from riverine to lacustrine conditions; however, the specific environmental factors controlling the size distributions of planktonic autotrophy and microheterotrophy ramain uncertain. Our results suggest that additional ecological factors (e.g., size-selective losses of cells by grazing and/or sinking, autotroph-microheterotroph interactions) must be considered, in addition to the availability of nutrients and suspended particles, as potential environment controls on the size distributions of planktonic autotrophy and microheterotrophy.

Key concepts: Autotroph, Plankton, Bacterioplankton, Fraction (chemistry), Environmental science, Heterotroph, Ecology, Picoplankton

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source