2018Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository (Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta)Open access

Conversational Overlap and Interruption in The Second Presidential Debate: Hillary Clinton VS Donald Trump

Syifaa Alawiyah Zulfah, Hilmi Akmal

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the conversational overlap and interruption \nthat contains in the conversation of the second presidential debate between \nHillary Clinton and Donald Trump in Washington University, St. Louis. The \nobjectives of the research are: (1) to identify the kinds of overlap and interruption \nin the conversation of the second presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and \nDonald Trump (2) to analyze how the conversation of the second presidential \ndebate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trumpshow the reason to do overlap \nand interruption. To get the answer to the research problem, this study uses a \ntheory of overlap proposed by Emanuel Schegloff and theory of interruption \nproposed by Murata.This research uses a qualitative method. The result of this \nresearch shows that in the debate there are24datacategorized as overlap and 38 \ndata categorized as an interruption, so interruption occurred more than overlap. \nAnd from 62 data, breaking up is the common reason for overlap and interruption.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This research aims to analyze the conversational overlap and interruption \nthat contains in the conversation of the second presidential debate between \nHillary Clinton and Donald Trump in Washington University, St. Louis. The \nobjectives of the research are: (1) to identify the kinds of overlap and interruption \nin the conversation of the second presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and \nDonald Trump (2) to analyze how the conversation of the second presidential \ndebate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trumpshow the reason to do overlap \nand interruption. To get the answer to the research problem, this study uses a \ntheory of overlap proposed by Emanuel Schegloff and theory of interruption \nproposed by Murata.This research uses a qualitative method. The result of this \nresearch shows that in the debate there are24datacategorized as overlap and 38 \ndata categorized as an interruption, so interruption occurred more than overlap. \nAnd from 62 data, breaking up is the common reason for overlap and interruption.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This research aims to analyze the conversational overlap and interruption \nthat contains in the conversation of the second presidential debate between \nHillary Clinton and Donald Trump in Washington University, St. Louis. The \nobjectives of the research are: (1) to identify the kinds of overlap and interruption \nin the conversation of the second presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and \nDonald Trump (2) to analyze how the conversation of the second presidential \ndebate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trumpshow the reason to do overlap \nand interruption. To get the answer to the research problem, this study uses a \ntheory of overlap proposed by Emanuel Schegloff and theory of interruption \nproposed by Murata.This research uses a qualitative method. The result of this \nresearch shows that in the debate there are24datacategorized as overlap and 38 \ndata categorized as an interruption, so interruption occurred more than overlap. \nAnd from 62 data, breaking up is the common reason for overlap and interruption.

Key concepts: Presidential system, Conversation, Political science, Media studies, Psychology, Sociology, Law, Communication

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Conversational Overlap and Interruption in The Second Presidential Debate: Hillary Clinton VS Donald Trump — Research Paper | ScholarLens