Conversational Overlap and Interruption in The Second Presidential Debate: Hillary Clinton VS Donald Trump
Syifaa Alawiyah Zulfah, Hilmi Akmal
Abstract
Open-access reader
Syifaa Alawiyah Zulfah, Hilmi Akmal
Abstract
Open-access reader
This research aims to analyze the conversational overlap and interruption \nthat contains in the conversation of the second presidential debate between \nHillary Clinton and Donald Trump in Washington University, St. Louis. The \nobjectives of the research are: (1) to identify the kinds of overlap and interruption \nin the conversation of the second presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and \nDonald Trump (2) to analyze how the conversation of the second presidential \ndebate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trumpshow the reason to do overlap \nand interruption. To get the answer to the research problem, this study uses a \ntheory of overlap proposed by Emanuel Schegloff and theory of interruption \nproposed by Murata.This research uses a qualitative method. The result of this \nresearch shows that in the debate there are24datacategorized as overlap and 38 \ndata categorized as an interruption, so interruption occurred more than overlap. \nAnd from 62 data, breaking up is the common reason for overlap and interruption.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This research aims to analyze the conversational overlap and interruption \nthat contains in the conversation of the second presidential debate between \nHillary Clinton and Donald Trump in Washington University, St. Louis. The \nobjectives of the research are: (1) to identify the kinds of overlap and interruption \nin the conversation of the second presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and \nDonald Trump (2) to analyze how the conversation of the second presidential \ndebate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trumpshow the reason to do overlap \nand interruption. To get the answer to the research problem, this study uses a \ntheory of overlap proposed by Emanuel Schegloff and theory of interruption \nproposed by Murata.This research uses a qualitative method. The result of this \nresearch shows that in the debate there are24datacategorized as overlap and 38 \ndata categorized as an interruption, so interruption occurred more than overlap. \nAnd from 62 data, breaking up is the common reason for overlap and interruption.
Key concepts: Presidential system, Conversation, Political science, Media studies, Psychology, Sociology, Law, Communication