2018•IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceOpen access

An Analysis of Law No. 17 0f 2014 on National Parliamentary Assembly, House of Representative, Regional House Council, and Regional House Representative: Viewed From The Principles of Good Governance

Rangga Ryo Rizki, Kristina Natalia, David Refansa Utama Lepong, Triana Hermawaty, Agung Wibowo

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Good governance becomes an important point on the post-reforms that willing to have a clean government, free from corruption, collusion and nepotism. Good governance is carried out in every level of government in Indonesia enhanced executive, legislative, and judiciary. The provision of Article 122 letter K and Article 245 of the revision of Law No. 17 of 2014 on National Parliamentary Assembly, House of Representatives, Regional House Council and Regional House Representatives are regarded as contradictory rule to the principle of good governance for the word "degrading" in the Article 122 letter K resulting multiple interpretation, consequently the Indonesian people who are essentially democracy citizens unwilling to put forward their aspirations to their representatives thus of this article is contrary to the principle of participation. Whereas in article 245 expresses the members of parliament who commits a criminal offense and will be examined by investigating agency shall received written approval from the president on the consideration of the Honorary Court Council. In other words this article gives the right of immunity which is contrary to the principle of rule of the law, so that the Democratic System can't be applied and it difficult to achieve the goal of good governance Indonesia.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Good governance becomes an important point on the post-reforms that willing to have a clean government, free from corruption, collusion and nepotism. Good governance is carried out in every level of government in Indonesia enhanced executive, legislative, and judiciary. The provision of Article 122 letter K and Article 245 of the revision of Law No. 17 of 2014 on National Parliamentary Assembly, House of Representatives, Regional House Council and Regional House Representatives are regarded as contradictory rule to the principle of good governance for the word "degrading" in the Article 122 letter K resulting multiple interpretation, consequently the Indonesian people who are essentially democracy citizens unwilling to put forward their aspirations to their representatives thus of this article is contrary to the principle of participation. Whereas in article 245 expresses the members of parliament who commits a criminal offense and will be examined by investigating agency shall received written approval from the president on the consideration of the Honorary Court Council. In other words this article gives the right of immunity which is contrary to the principle of rule of the law, so that the Democratic System can't be applied and it difficult to achieve the goal of good governance Indonesia.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Good governance becomes an important point on the post-reforms that willing to have a clean government, free from corruption, collusion and nepotism. Good governance is carried out in every level of government in Indonesia enhanced executive, legislative, and judiciary. The provision of Article 122 letter K and Article 245 of the revision of Law No. 17 of 2014 on National Parliamentary Assembly, House of Representatives, Regional House Council and Regional House Representatives are regarded as contradictory rule to the principle of good governance for the word "degrading" in the Article 122 letter K resulting multiple interpretation, consequently the Indonesian people who are essentially democracy citizens unwilling to put forward their aspirations to their representatives thus of this article is contrary to the principle of participation. Whereas in article 245 expresses the members of parliament who commits a criminal offense and will be examined by investigating agency shall received written approval from the president on the consideration of the Honorary Court Council. In other words this article gives the right of immunity which is contrary to the principle of rule of the law, so that the Democratic System can't be applied and it difficult to achieve the goal of good governance Indonesia.

Key concepts: House of Representatives, Lower house, Parliament, Good governance, House of Commons, Democracy, Law, Legislature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Analysis of Law No. 17 0f 2014 on National Parliamentary Assembly, House of Representative, Regional House Council, and Regional House Representative: Viewed From The Principles of Good Governance — Research Paper | ScholarLens