2018•DSpace repository (University of Tartu)Open access

Against the narrative self

Ayesha Rehman

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

In my thesis, I argue against the narrative conception of self, the idea that our self is \nnarrative in structure and that we live life as a narrative. First, I differentiate between the \nstrong and weak narrative view of self. I classify Dennett and Bruner’s account as the \nstrong claim, Schechtman and Cavarero’s as the weak narrative claim. Second, I reject \nboth the descriptive and normative narrativity thesis. I question the universality of a \nNarrative outlook. I argue that the artificial constructing of a narrative self is not conducive \nto self-understanding and that our choices of structuring it might be limiting. Last, I defend \nthe non-Narrative conception of self against the common objection that without a selfnarrative \none cannot be held accountable. I discuss Eichmann’s defense in Jerusalem along \nthe way to untangle the link between narrativity and accountability.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In my thesis, I argue against the narrative conception of self, the idea that our self is \nnarrative in structure and that we live life as a narrative. First, I differentiate between the \nstrong and weak narrative view of self. I classify Dennett and Bruner’s account as the \nstrong claim, Schechtman and Cavarero’s as the weak narrative claim. Second, I reject \nboth the descriptive and normative narrativity thesis. I question the universality of a \nNarrative outlook. I argue that the artificial constructing of a narrative self is not conducive \nto self-understanding and that our choices of structuring it might be limiting. Last, I defend \nthe non-Narrative conception of self against the common objection that without a selfnarrative \none cannot be held accountable. I discuss Eichmann’s defense in Jerusalem along \nthe way to untangle the link between narrativity and accountability.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In my thesis, I argue against the narrative conception of self, the idea that our self is \nnarrative in structure and that we live life as a narrative. First, I differentiate between the \nstrong and weak narrative view of self. I classify Dennett and Bruner’s account as the \nstrong claim, Schechtman and Cavarero’s as the weak narrative claim. Second, I reject \nboth the descriptive and normative narrativity thesis. I question the universality of a \nNarrative outlook. I argue that the artificial constructing of a narrative self is not conducive \nto self-understanding and that our choices of structuring it might be limiting. Last, I defend \nthe non-Narrative conception of self against the common objection that without a selfnarrative \none cannot be held accountable. I discuss Eichmann’s defense in Jerusalem along \nthe way to untangle the link between narrativity and accountability.

Key concepts: Narrative, Psychology, Literature, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Against the narrative self — Research Paper | ScholarLens