2018•Rapid Communications in Mass SpectrometryRequires access

Discrimination factors of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes from diet to hair in captive large Arctic carnivores of conservation concern

Vincent L’Hérault, Nicolas Lecomte, Marie-Hélène Truchon, Dominique Berteaux

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Rationale Stable isotope analysis is widely used to reconstruct diet, delineate trophic interactions, and determine energy pathways. Such ecological inferences are based on the idea that animals are, isotopically, what they eat but with a predictable difference between the isotopic ratio of a consumer and that of its diet, coined as the discrimination factor. Providing correct estimates of diet‐consumer isotopic discrimination in controlled conditions is key for a robust application of the stable isotopes technique in the wild. Methods Using a Finnigan Mat Delta Plus isotope‐ratio mass spectrometer, we investigated isotopic discrimination of carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios (δ 13 C and δ 15 N values) in guard hairs of four Arctic predators; the wolf ( n = 7), the wolverine ( n = 2), the grizzly bear ( n = 2), and the polar bear ( n = 3). During a 3‐month trial, carnivores were fed a mixed diet. The δ 13 C and δ 15 N values, and the mass (g) of diet items, were monitored weekly for each individual to determine their Total Diet Average ratios. Results Diet‐hair isotopic discrimination (Δx) varied according to species, ranging [1.88 ± 0.69‰: 3.2 ± 0.69‰] for δ 13 C values, and [1.58 ± 0.17‰: 3.81 ± 0.22‰] for δ 15 N values. Adult wolves Δ 13 C average (2.03 ± 0.7‰) was lower than that of young wolves (2.60 ± 0.8‰) and any other species (combined average of 2.59 ± 0.28‰), except for the wolverine (2.12 ± 0.23‰). Wolves Δ 15 N averages (juveniles: 3.51 ± 0.34‰, adults: 3.68 ± 0.28‰) were higher than those of any other species (combined average: 2.50 ± 0.58‰). Conclusions The discrimination factors for δ 13 C and δ 15 N values calculated in this study could be used in ecological studies dealing with free‐ranging animals, with implications for non‐invasive research approaches. As in other controlled discrimination studies, we recommend caution in applying our discrimination factors when the population structure is heterogeneous.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rationale Stable isotope analysis is widely used to reconstruct diet, delineate trophic interactions, and determine energy pathways. Such ecological inferences are based on the idea that animals are, isotopically, what they eat but with a predictable difference between the isotopic ratio of a consumer and that of its diet, coined as the discrimination factor. Providing correct estimates of diet‐consumer isotopic discrimination in controlled conditions is key for a robust application of the stable isotopes technique in the wild. Methods Using a Finnigan Mat Delta Plus isotope‐ratio mass spectrometer, we investigated isotopic discrimination of carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios (δ 13 C and δ 15 N values) in guard hairs of four Arctic predators; the wolf ( n = 7), the wolverine ( n = 2), the grizzly bear ( n = 2), and the polar bear ( n = 3). During a 3‐month trial, carnivores were fed a mixed diet. The δ 13 C and δ 15 N values, and the mass (g) of diet items, were monitored weekly for each individual to determine their Total Diet Average ratios. Results Diet‐hair isotopic discrimination (Δx) varied according to species, ranging [1.88 ± 0.69‰: 3.2 ± 0.69‰] for δ 13 C values, and [1.58 ± 0.17‰: 3.81 ± 0.22‰] for δ 15 N values. Adult wolves Δ 13 C average (2.03 ± 0.7‰) was lower than that of young wolves (2.60 ± 0.8‰) and any other species (combined average of 2.59 ± 0.28‰), except for the wolverine (2.12 ± 0.23‰). Wolves Δ 15 N averages (juveniles: 3.51 ± 0.34‰, adults: 3.68 ± 0.28‰) were higher than those of any other species (combined average: 2.50 ± 0.58‰). Conclusions The discrimination factors for δ 13 C and δ 15 N values calculated in this study could be used in ecological studies dealing with free‐ranging animals, with implications for non‐invasive research approaches. As in other controlled discrimination studies, we recommend caution in applying our discrimination factors when the population structure is heterogeneous.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rationale Stable isotope analysis is widely used to reconstruct diet, delineate trophic interactions, and determine energy pathways. Such ecological inferences are based on the idea that animals are, isotopically, what they eat but with a predictable difference between the isotopic ratio of a consumer and that of its diet, coined as the discrimination factor. Providing correct estimates of diet‐consumer isotopic discrimination in controlled conditions is key for a robust application of the stable isotopes technique in the wild. Methods Using a Finnigan Mat Delta Plus isotope‐ratio mass spectrometer, we investigated isotopic discrimination of carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios (δ 13 C and δ 15 N values) in guard hairs of four Arctic predators; the wolf ( n = 7), the wolverine ( n = 2), the grizzly bear ( n = 2), and the polar bear ( n = 3). During a 3‐month trial, carnivores were fed a mixed diet. The δ 13 C and δ 15 N values, and the mass (g) of diet items, were monitored weekly for each individual to determine their Total Diet Average ratios. Results Diet‐hair isotopic discrimination (Δx) varied according to species, ranging [1.88 ± 0.69‰: 3.2 ± 0.69‰] for δ 13 C values, and [1.58 ± 0.17‰: 3.81 ± 0.22‰] for δ 15 N values. Adult wolves Δ 13 C average (2.03 ± 0.7‰) was lower than that of young wolves (2.60 ± 0.8‰) and any other species (combined average of 2.59 ± 0.28‰), except for the wolverine (2.12 ± 0.23‰). Wolves Δ 15 N averages (juveniles: 3.51 ± 0.34‰, adults: 3.68 ± 0.28‰) were higher than those of any other species (combined average: 2.50 ± 0.58‰). Conclusions The discrimination factors for δ 13 C and δ 15 N values calculated in this study could be used in ecological studies dealing with free‐ranging animals, with implications for non‐invasive research approaches. As in other controlled discrimination studies, we recommend caution in applying our discrimination factors when the population structure is heterogeneous.

Key concepts: Isotopes of nitrogen, Isotope analysis, Stable isotope ratio, Trophic level, Isotopes of carbon, δ15N, Chemistry, Arctic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discrimination factors of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes from diet to hair in captive large Arctic carnivores of conservation concern — Research Paper | ScholarLens