2018IMISCOE research seriesOpen access

Old Wine in New Bottles? Comparing the Post-War Guest Worker Migration and the Post 1989 Migration from CEE-Countries to EU-Member Countries

Rinus Penninx

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

This chapter compares the movement of workers from Central and Eastern European countries to European Union member states after 1990 (CEES) with the Guest Worker System of the period 1955–1974 (GWS). Three factors are essential for the emergence and continuation of these migration systems. The first factor refers to the economic push-pull factors of labour migration. When measured in terms of GDP differentials between sending and receiving countries, of wage differentials and of work opportunities - these turn out to be quite comparable in both migration systems. The second factors specifies how individuals enter into a labour migration system: the information of migration alternatives that migrants have, the networks that may help them and the intermediaries and facilitators that take away barriers. In this respect, there seem to be some significant differences between the two systems. The third factor is related to the regulatory systems of international migration. Here the differences between the two systems are fundamental: GWS developed into a highly regulated system of labour migration, while migration in the CEES system prospered due to the unrestricted free movement within the EU in a neoliberal economic climate with less labour market regulation. It is the combination of differences in the latter two factors that makes for a different selection of who is moving and for what purpose and, ultimately, for a greater unpredictability of the CEE migration. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter compares the movement of workers from Central and Eastern European countries to European Union member states after 1990 (CEES) with the Guest Worker System of the period 1955–1974 (GWS). Three factors are essential for the emergence and continuation of these migration systems. The first factor refers to the economic push-pull factors of labour migration. When measured in terms of GDP differentials between sending and receiving countries, of wage differentials and of work opportunities - these turn out to be quite comparable in both migration systems. The second factors specifies how individuals enter into a labour migration system: the information of migration alternatives that migrants have, the networks that may help them and the intermediaries and facilitators that take away barriers. In this respect, there seem to be some significant differences between the two systems. The third factor is related to the regulatory systems of international migration. Here the differences between the two systems are fundamental: GWS developed into a highly regulated system of labour migration, while migration in the CEES system prospered due to the unrestricted free movement within the EU in a neoliberal economic climate with less labour market regulation. It is the combination of differences in the latter two factors that makes for a different selection of who is moving and for what purpose and, ultimately, for a greater unpredictability of the CEE migration. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter compares the movement of workers from Central and Eastern European countries to European Union member states after 1990 (CEES) with the Guest Worker System of the period 1955–1974 (GWS). Three factors are essential for the emergence and continuation of these migration systems. The first factor refers to the economic push-pull factors of labour migration. When measured in terms of GDP differentials between sending and receiving countries, of wage differentials and of work opportunities - these turn out to be quite comparable in both migration systems. The second factors specifies how individuals enter into a labour migration system: the information of migration alternatives that migrants have, the networks that may help them and the intermediaries and facilitators that take away barriers. In this respect, there seem to be some significant differences between the two systems. The third factor is related to the regulatory systems of international migration. Here the differences between the two systems are fundamental: GWS developed into a highly regulated system of labour migration, while migration in the CEES system prospered due to the unrestricted free movement within the EU in a neoliberal economic climate with less labour market regulation. It is the combination of differences in the latter two factors that makes for a different selection of who is moving and for what purpose and, ultimately, for a greater unpredictability of the CEE migration. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Wine, Member states, Eu countries, Political science, Business, Economic history, International trade, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Old Wine in New Bottles? Comparing the Post-War Guest Worker Migration and the Post 1989 Migration from CEE-Countries to EU-Member Countries — Research Paper | ScholarLens