2018Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

How Practical Reasoning Is Possible

Jonathan Dancy

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter asks whether action can stand in much the same relation (or relations) to the considerations adduced in reasoning as can belief, and suggests that the answer is going to be yes. It considers the nature of the favouring relation, which will be central to the book’s overall approach. The relation is a tripartite one with three places in it, one for that which favours, one for the agent, and one for the response that is favoured. It argues that only matters of fact can favour anything; propositions are incapable of this feat. But it allows, or rather insists, that no particular action or belief can be favoured either by reasons or by reasoning. Practical reasoning can only take us to acting in a certain way, never to the particular action that we perform in the light of that reasoning

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter asks whether action can stand in much the same relation (or relations) to the considerations adduced in reasoning as can belief, and suggests that the answer is going to be yes. It considers the nature of the favouring relation, which will be central to the book’s overall approach. The relation is a tripartite one with three places in it, one for that which favours, one for the agent, and one for the response that is favoured. It argues that only matters of fact can favour anything; propositions are incapable of this feat. But it allows, or rather insists, that no particular action or belief can be favoured either by reasons or by reasoning. Practical reasoning can only take us to acting in a certain way, never to the particular action that we perform in the light of that reasoning

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter asks whether action can stand in much the same relation (or relations) to the considerations adduced in reasoning as can belief, and suggests that the answer is going to be yes. It considers the nature of the favouring relation, which will be central to the book’s overall approach. The relation is a tripartite one with three places in it, one for that which favours, one for the agent, and one for the response that is favoured. It argues that only matters of fact can favour anything; propositions are incapable of this feat. But it allows, or rather insists, that no particular action or belief can be favoured either by reasons or by reasoning. Practical reasoning can only take us to acting in a certain way, never to the particular action that we perform in the light of that reasoning

Key concepts: Relation (database), Action (physics), Epistemology, Cognitive science, Computer science, Psychology, Philosophy, Quantum mechanics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How Practical Reasoning Is Possible — Research Paper | ScholarLens