2018Brill Open LawOpen access

Public Goods and International Investment Law: Does the New Generation of iias Better Protect Human Rights?

Pavel Šturma

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The implicit inclusion of human rights and other public goods in international investment law by way of interpretation is always contingent on various factual and legal elements. Consequently, it cannot ensure that all investment arbitration tribunals will arrive to the same or at least similar conclusions when it comes to the inclusion of human rights. That is why the trend to include explicit provisions or references into the newly negotiated iias seems to be advisable. The article aims at presenting some new trends in both treaties (bits and other iias) and awards of investment tribunals.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The implicit inclusion of human rights and other public goods in international investment law by way of interpretation is always contingent on various factual and legal elements. Consequently, it cannot ensure that all investment arbitration tribunals will arrive to the same or at least similar conclusions when it comes to the inclusion of human rights. That is why the trend to include explicit provisions or references into the newly negotiated iias seems to be advisable. The article aims at presenting some new trends in both treaties (bits and other iias) and awards of investment tribunals.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The implicit inclusion of human rights and other public goods in international investment law by way of interpretation is always contingent on various factual and legal elements. Consequently, it cannot ensure that all investment arbitration tribunals will arrive to the same or at least similar conclusions when it comes to the inclusion of human rights. That is why the trend to include explicit provisions or references into the newly negotiated iias seems to be advisable. The article aims at presenting some new trends in both treaties (bits and other iias) and awards of investment tribunals.

Key concepts: Investment arbitration, Human rights, Investment (military), Arbitration, Interpretation (philosophy), International investment, Inclusion (mineral), Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public Goods and International Investment Law: Does the New Generation of iias Better Protect Human Rights? — Research Paper | ScholarLens