Public Goods and International Investment Law: Does the New Generation of iias Better Protect Human Rights?
Pavel Šturma
Abstract
Pavel Šturma
Abstract
The implicit inclusion of human rights and other public goods in international investment law by way of interpretation is always contingent on various factual and legal elements. Consequently, it cannot ensure that all investment arbitration tribunals will arrive to the same or at least similar conclusions when it comes to the inclusion of human rights. That is why the trend to include explicit provisions or references into the newly negotiated iias seems to be advisable. The article aims at presenting some new trends in both treaties (bits and other iias) and awards of investment tribunals.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The implicit inclusion of human rights and other public goods in international investment law by way of interpretation is always contingent on various factual and legal elements. Consequently, it cannot ensure that all investment arbitration tribunals will arrive to the same or at least similar conclusions when it comes to the inclusion of human rights. That is why the trend to include explicit provisions or references into the newly negotiated iias seems to be advisable. The article aims at presenting some new trends in both treaties (bits and other iias) and awards of investment tribunals.
Key concepts: Investment arbitration, Human rights, Investment (military), Arbitration, Interpretation (philosophy), International investment, Inclusion (mineral), Law