Kuntal Banerjee
Abstract
Open-access reader
We present sufficient conditions for the non-representability of a class of lexicographic preferences. The proof of non-representability builds on the classical Debreu (1954) argument and its usefulness in generating counter examples is demonstrated through a series of examples.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We present sufficient conditions for the non-representability of a class of lexicographic preferences. The proof of non-representability builds on the classical Debreu (1954) argument and its usefulness in generating counter examples is demonstrated through a series of examples.
Key concepts: Lexicographical order, Class (philosophy), Argument (complex analysis), Mathematical economics, Mathematics, Series (stratigraphy), Calculus (dental), Computer science