1988Unpublished venueRequires access

Killing the Messenger: The Place of Systems Acquisition in the National Security Planning and Management Systems

James A. Winnefeld

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract : Because of the nature of their responsibilities, in acquisition, in resource planning and programming, in threat analysis and strategy development, and in operational planning, senior DoD officials tend to focus on their particular piece of the whole at the expense of understanding its place in the totality of Departmental and related national security management efforts. Reform proposals typically focus on fixing a problem in one or two areas: The Packard Commission on acquisition and strategy development, Goldwater-Nichols on organizational and operational planning responsibilities, and so on. Can the acquisition process be reformed in any significant way without corresponding changes in the other elements of DoD management systems? What are the limits of reform efforts that focus exclusively on the acquisition process itself? This paper is an attempt to set the stage for answering these questions by mapping out the major components of the DoD management system and suggesting their relationship to each other, and specifically to the acquisition subsystem.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : Because of the nature of their responsibilities, in acquisition, in resource planning and programming, in threat analysis and strategy development, and in operational planning, senior DoD officials tend to focus on their particular piece of the whole at the expense of understanding its place in the totality of Departmental and related national security management efforts. Reform proposals typically focus on fixing a problem in one or two areas: The Packard Commission on acquisition and strategy development, Goldwater-Nichols on organizational and operational planning responsibilities, and so on. Can the acquisition process be reformed in any significant way without corresponding changes in the other elements of DoD management systems? What are the limits of reform efforts that focus exclusively on the acquisition process itself? This paper is an attempt to set the stage for answering these questions by mapping out the major components of the DoD management system and suggesting their relationship to each other, and specifically to the acquisition subsystem.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : Because of the nature of their responsibilities, in acquisition, in resource planning and programming, in threat analysis and strategy development, and in operational planning, senior DoD officials tend to focus on their particular piece of the whole at the expense of understanding its place in the totality of Departmental and related national security management efforts. Reform proposals typically focus on fixing a problem in one or two areas: The Packard Commission on acquisition and strategy development, Goldwater-Nichols on organizational and operational planning responsibilities, and so on. Can the acquisition process be reformed in any significant way without corresponding changes in the other elements of DoD management systems? What are the limits of reform efforts that focus exclusively on the acquisition process itself? This paper is an attempt to set the stage for answering these questions by mapping out the major components of the DoD management system and suggesting their relationship to each other, and specifically to the acquisition subsystem.

Key concepts: Process (computing), Process management, Focus (optics), Commission, National security, Business, Engineering management, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Killing the Messenger: The Place of Systems Acquisition in the National Security Planning and Management Systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens