1997Paroles geléesOpen access

‘That God Within:’ Writing Female Genius from Diderot to Staël

Cecilia Feilla

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

That God Within: Writing Female Genius from Diderot to Stael Cecilia Feilla A thin but significant line is traversed in the representation of female authorship between the depiction of Germaine de Stael at age twenty as the possessed pretresse la plus celebre d'ApoUon (Stael's Journals intimes qtd. in Vallois 4) and that of Emily Bronte in 1851 as an author who possesses the creative gift (C. Bronte One of the central figures to effect this change is, ironically, Her novel, Corinne, ou, I' Italic (1807) rescripts posses- sion (both ownership and the proper) in important ways which Stael herself. negotiate a new place for female genius in the novel. What I pursue in this paper is how genius is constructed along gender lines at moment it takes its modem introjected form as a natural gift in the late eighteenth century, and how the inspiration, proph- the ecy and possession which characterize genius take on a nega- tive valence when applied to women writers, often emblematized as sibylline, and read as signs of hysteria. Is the woman writer possessed by genius (a transcendent figure) or does she possess genius (an immanent gift)? A close reading of Corinne in light of Denis Diderot's essay, Sur les femmes (1772), will reveal how gender marks the discourse of writing and genius, especially as it pertains to issues of style and female authorship. Diderot wrote Sur les femmes as a reply to I'Abbe Antoine- Leonard Thomas's Essai sur le caractere, les moeurs et I'esprit des femmes (1772). A complex meditation on the nature of women and their potential for genius, Diderot's essay is also a reflection on writing and the exercise of style. From the first lines, Diderot establishes his authority on the subject of women by invoking his carnal knowledge of them. He explicitly links the lack of hetero- sexual activity in men with a lack of style in writing: Thomas, he claims, cannot write because he is celibate (251, 261-262), d' Alembert cannot because he is homosexual (262). Man distinguishes himself with style (Buffon's Le style est I'homme meme [30]), and the subject fashioning this style is woman:

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

That God Within: Writing Female Genius from Diderot to Stael Cecilia Feilla A thin but significant line is traversed in the representation of female authorship between the depiction of Germaine de Stael at age twenty as the possessed pretresse la plus celebre d'ApoUon (Stael's Journals intimes qtd. in Vallois 4) and that of Emily Bronte in 1851 as an author who possesses the creative gift (C. Bronte One of the central figures to effect this change is, ironically, Her novel, Corinne, ou, I' Italic (1807) rescripts posses- sion (both ownership and the proper) in important ways which Stael herself. negotiate a new place for female genius in the novel. What I pursue in this paper is how genius is constructed along gender lines at moment it takes its modem introjected form as a natural gift in the late eighteenth century, and how the inspiration, proph- the ecy and possession which characterize genius take on a nega- tive valence when applied to women writers, often emblematized as sibylline, and read as signs of hysteria. Is the woman writer possessed by genius (a transcendent figure) or does she possess genius (an immanent gift)? A close reading of Corinne in light of Denis Diderot's essay, Sur les femmes (1772), will reveal how gender marks the discourse of writing and genius, especially as it pertains to issues of style and female authorship. Diderot wrote Sur les femmes as a reply to I'Abbe Antoine- Leonard Thomas's Essai sur le caractere, les moeurs et I'esprit des femmes (1772). A complex meditation on the nature of women and their potential for genius, Diderot's essay is also a reflection on writing and the exercise of style. From the first lines, Diderot establishes his authority on the subject of women by invoking his carnal knowledge of them. He explicitly links the lack of hetero- sexual activity in men with a lack of style in writing: Thomas, he claims, cannot write because he is celibate (251, 261-262), d' Alembert cannot because he is homosexual (262). Man distinguishes himself with style (Buffon's Le style est I'homme meme [30]), and the subject fashioning this style is woman:

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

That God Within: Writing Female Genius from Diderot to Stael Cecilia Feilla A thin but significant line is traversed in the representation of female authorship between the depiction of Germaine de Stael at age twenty as the possessed pretresse la plus celebre d'ApoUon (Stael's Journals intimes qtd. in Vallois 4) and that of Emily Bronte in 1851 as an author who possesses the creative gift (C. Bronte One of the central figures to effect this change is, ironically, Her novel, Corinne, ou, I' Italic (1807) rescripts posses- sion (both ownership and the proper) in important ways which Stael herself. negotiate a new place for female genius in the novel. What I pursue in this paper is how genius is constructed along gender lines at moment it takes its modem introjected form as a natural gift in the late eighteenth century, and how the inspiration, proph- the ecy and possession which characterize genius take on a nega- tive valence when applied to women writers, often emblematized as sibylline, and read as signs of hysteria. Is the woman writer possessed by genius (a transcendent figure) or does she possess genius (an immanent gift)? A close reading of Corinne in light of Denis Diderot's essay, Sur les femmes (1772), will reveal how gender marks the discourse of writing and genius, especially as it pertains to issues of style and female authorship. Diderot wrote Sur les femmes as a reply to I'Abbe Antoine- Leonard Thomas's Essai sur le caractere, les moeurs et I'esprit des femmes (1772). A complex meditation on the nature of women and their potential for genius, Diderot's essay is also a reflection on writing and the exercise of style. From the first lines, Diderot establishes his authority on the subject of women by invoking his carnal knowledge of them. He explicitly links the lack of hetero- sexual activity in men with a lack of style in writing: Thomas, he claims, cannot write because he is celibate (251, 261-262), d' Alembert cannot because he is homosexual (262). Man distinguishes himself with style (Buffon's Le style est I'homme meme [30]), and the subject fashioning this style is woman:

Key concepts: Genius, Literature, Art, Possession (linguistics), Philosophy, Depiction, Art history, Linguistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
‘That God Within:’ Writing Female Genius from Diderot to Staël — Research Paper | ScholarLens