A Simple Extension to the Dixit-Stiglitz Framework to Allow for Strategic Interaction
Niroth Chhy
Abstract
Open-access reader
Niroth Chhy
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper considers a simple extension to the Dixit-Stiglitz framework to allow for strategic interaction. We show that the markup under Bertrand competition is strictly lower than that under Cournot competition and is strictly higher than that under monopolistic competition. We also show that there are two opposing forces: the love for variety and price distortion. Under monopolistic competition, these forces offset one another, and the equilibrium is the second-best optimum. Under oligopolistic competition, price distortion dominates and, because of a lower markup, the social welfare under Bertrand competition is strictly higher than that under Cournot competition.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper considers a simple extension to the Dixit-Stiglitz framework to allow for strategic interaction. We show that the markup under Bertrand competition is strictly lower than that under Cournot competition and is strictly higher than that under monopolistic competition. We also show that there are two opposing forces: the love for variety and price distortion. Under monopolistic competition, these forces offset one another, and the equilibrium is the second-best optimum. Under oligopolistic competition, price distortion dominates and, because of a lower markup, the social welfare under Bertrand competition is strictly higher than that under Cournot competition.
Key concepts: Monopolistic competition, Cournot competition, Bertrand competition, Economics, Oligopoly, Microeconomics, Distortion (music), Strategic complements