2018Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter WaveRequires access

James Webb Space Telescope optical performance predictions post cryogenic vacuum tests

Paul A. Lightsey, J. Scott Knight, Allison Barto, Koby Smith, Scott Rohrbach, Kimberly I. Mehalick, Lee D. Feinberg, Conrad Wells, Charles B. Atkinson, Taylor S. Chonis, Laura Coyle, Scott T. Acton, William L. Hayden, James B. Hadaway

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

The James Webb Space Telescope is a large space-based astronomical telescope that will operate at cryogenic temperatures. Because of its size, the telescope must be stowed in an inoperable configuration for launch and remotely reconfigured in space to meet the operational requirements using active Wave Front Sensing and Control (WFSC). Predicting optical performance for the flight system relies on a sequence of incremental tests and analyses that has culminated with the cryogenic vacuum test of the integrated Optical Telescope Element (OTE) and Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM) referred to as OTIS. The interplay between the optical budgeting process, test verification results at incrementally increasing levels of integration, use of test validated models, and the WFSC process to produce the final optical performance predictions for final verification by analysis will be presented.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The James Webb Space Telescope is a large space-based astronomical telescope that will operate at cryogenic temperatures. Because of its size, the telescope must be stowed in an inoperable configuration for launch and remotely reconfigured in space to meet the operational requirements using active Wave Front Sensing and Control (WFSC). Predicting optical performance for the flight system relies on a sequence of incremental tests and analyses that has culminated with the cryogenic vacuum test of the integrated Optical Telescope Element (OTE) and Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM) referred to as OTIS. The interplay between the optical budgeting process, test verification results at incrementally increasing levels of integration, use of test validated models, and the WFSC process to produce the final optical performance predictions for final verification by analysis will be presented.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The James Webb Space Telescope is a large space-based astronomical telescope that will operate at cryogenic temperatures. Because of its size, the telescope must be stowed in an inoperable configuration for launch and remotely reconfigured in space to meet the operational requirements using active Wave Front Sensing and Control (WFSC). Predicting optical performance for the flight system relies on a sequence of incremental tests and analyses that has culminated with the cryogenic vacuum test of the integrated Optical Telescope Element (OTE) and Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM) referred to as OTIS. The interplay between the optical budgeting process, test verification results at incrementally increasing levels of integration, use of test validated models, and the WFSC process to produce the final optical performance predictions for final verification by analysis will be presented.

Key concepts: James Webb Space Telescope, Telescope, Spitzer Space Telescope, Optical telescope, Process (computing), Aerospace engineering, Optics, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
James Webb Space Telescope optical performance predictions post cryogenic vacuum tests — Research Paper | ScholarLens