2004Transportation Research Board eBooksRequires access

Automated Pavement Distress Collection Techniques

University of Washington

Open publisher page 143 citations

Abstract

This report documents highway community practice and research and development efforts in the automated collection and processing of pavement condition data techniques typically used in network-level pavement management. The scope of the study covered all phases of automated pavement data collection and processing for pavement surface distress, pavement ride quality, rut-depth measurements, and joint-faulting measurements. Included in the scope were technologies employed, contracting issues, quality assurance, costs and benefits of automated techniques, monitoring frequencies and sampling protocols in use, degree of adoption of national standards for data collection, and contrast between the state of the art and the state of the practice. Three case studies are included as examples of transportation agencies applying a variety of methods for pavement condition data collection and processing. This synthesis report included a review of published literature of North American and European resources and a survey of state transportation agencies, the Federal Highway Administration, Canadian provinces, and the World Road Association. In addition, information was gathered from the October 2002 Pavement Evaluation Conference, held in Roanoke, Virginia. Three previous syntheses (NCHRP Syntheses 76, 126, and 203) have summarized much of the background material and are referenced frequently in this report.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report documents highway community practice and research and development efforts in the automated collection and processing of pavement condition data techniques typically used in network-level pavement management. The scope of the study covered all phases of automated pavement data collection and processing for pavement surface distress, pavement ride quality, rut-depth measurements, and joint-faulting measurements. Included in the scope were technologies employed, contracting issues, quality assurance, costs and benefits of automated techniques, monitoring frequencies and sampling protocols in use, degree of adoption of national standards for data collection, and contrast between the state of the art and the state of the practice. Three case studies are included as examples of transportation agencies applying a variety of methods for pavement condition data collection and processing. This synthesis report included a review of published literature of North American and European resources and a survey of state transportation agencies, the Federal Highway Administration, Canadian provinces, and the World Road Association. In addition, information was gathered from the October 2002 Pavement Evaluation Conference, held in Roanoke, Virginia. Three previous syntheses (NCHRP Syntheses 76, 126, and 203) have summarized much of the background material and are referenced frequently in this report.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 143 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report documents highway community practice and research and development efforts in the automated collection and processing of pavement condition data techniques typically used in network-level pavement management. The scope of the study covered all phases of automated pavement data collection and processing for pavement surface distress, pavement ride quality, rut-depth measurements, and joint-faulting measurements. Included in the scope were technologies employed, contracting issues, quality assurance, costs and benefits of automated techniques, monitoring frequencies and sampling protocols in use, degree of adoption of national standards for data collection, and contrast between the state of the art and the state of the practice. Three case studies are included as examples of transportation agencies applying a variety of methods for pavement condition data collection and processing. This synthesis report included a review of published literature of North American and European resources and a survey of state transportation agencies, the Federal Highway Administration, Canadian provinces, and the World Road Association. In addition, information was gathered from the October 2002 Pavement Evaluation Conference, held in Roanoke, Virginia. Three previous syntheses (NCHRP Syntheses 76, 126, and 203) have summarized much of the background material and are referenced frequently in this report.

Key concepts: Distress, Computer science, Psychology, Clinical psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Automated Pavement Distress Collection Techniques — Research Paper | ScholarLens