2007Unpublished venueRequires access

The effect of a pre- and probiotic (separate and in combination) on the performance of broilers.

C. Kwakernaak, J.D. van der Klis, K. De Gussem

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

As an alternative for the banned antimicrobial growth promoters in poultry, pre-, and probiotics are used in practical broiler feeding. A trial was done by Schothorst Feed Research to test Vetmostan, an exocellular mannan oligosaccharide (MOS) produced by an intentionally cultured micro-organism, and a probiotic based on Bacillus subtilis spores added to a wheat/soya-based broiler diets. MOS was added as 2, 1 and 1 g/kg and the probiotic as 0.5, 0.5 and 0 g/kg to the starter, grower and finisher, respectively. 408 Ross male and 408 female day-old broilers were randomly allocated to 48 pens (17 birds/pen). Per sexe, each dietary strategy was tested with 6 replicate pens. MOS improved body weight gain (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) after 36 days significantly both with 1.9%, whereas Bacillus subtilis had no significant effect on BWG and FCR. The use of both products together improved BWG and FCR significantly with 3.0 and 2.1% respectively. Positive effects became significant after 14 days. No interaction between sexe and treatment was found. It was concluded that the addition of MOS to the diets was more effective stimulating broiler performance than the addition of Bacillus subtilis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As an alternative for the banned antimicrobial growth promoters in poultry, pre-, and probiotics are used in practical broiler feeding. A trial was done by Schothorst Feed Research to test Vetmostan, an exocellular mannan oligosaccharide (MOS) produced by an intentionally cultured micro-organism, and a probiotic based on Bacillus subtilis spores added to a wheat/soya-based broiler diets. MOS was added as 2, 1 and 1 g/kg and the probiotic as 0.5, 0.5 and 0 g/kg to the starter, grower and finisher, respectively. 408 Ross male and 408 female day-old broilers were randomly allocated to 48 pens (17 birds/pen). Per sexe, each dietary strategy was tested with 6 replicate pens. MOS improved body weight gain (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) after 36 days significantly both with 1.9%, whereas Bacillus subtilis had no significant effect on BWG and FCR. The use of both products together improved BWG and FCR significantly with 3.0 and 2.1% respectively. Positive effects became significant after 14 days. No interaction between sexe and treatment was found. It was concluded that the addition of MOS to the diets was more effective stimulating broiler performance than the addition of Bacillus subtilis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As an alternative for the banned antimicrobial growth promoters in poultry, pre-, and probiotics are used in practical broiler feeding. A trial was done by Schothorst Feed Research to test Vetmostan, an exocellular mannan oligosaccharide (MOS) produced by an intentionally cultured micro-organism, and a probiotic based on Bacillus subtilis spores added to a wheat/soya-based broiler diets. MOS was added as 2, 1 and 1 g/kg and the probiotic as 0.5, 0.5 and 0 g/kg to the starter, grower and finisher, respectively. 408 Ross male and 408 female day-old broilers were randomly allocated to 48 pens (17 birds/pen). Per sexe, each dietary strategy was tested with 6 replicate pens. MOS improved body weight gain (BWG) and feed conversion ratio (FCR) after 36 days significantly both with 1.9%, whereas Bacillus subtilis had no significant effect on BWG and FCR. The use of both products together improved BWG and FCR significantly with 3.0 and 2.1% respectively. Positive effects became significant after 14 days. No interaction between sexe and treatment was found. It was concluded that the addition of MOS to the diets was more effective stimulating broiler performance than the addition of Bacillus subtilis.

Key concepts: Broiler, Probiotic, Starter, Bacillus subtilis, Feed conversion ratio, Food science, Mannan, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effect of a pre- and probiotic (separate and in combination) on the performance of broilers. — Research Paper | ScholarLens