2019•Journal of Applied EconometricsOpen access

Two are better than one: Volatility forecasting using multiplicative component GARCH‐MIDAS models

Christian A. Conrad, Onno Kleen

Open full text 143 citations

Abstract

Summary We examine the properties and forecast performance of multiplicative volatility specifications that belong to the class of generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity–mixed‐data sampling (GARCH‐MIDAS) models suggested in Engle, Ghysels, and Sohn ( Review of Economics and Statistics , 2013, 95 , 776–797). In those models volatility is decomposed into a short‐term GARCH component and a long‐term component that is driven by an explanatory variable. We derive the kurtosis of returns, the autocorrelation function of squared returns, and the R 2 of a Mincer–Zarnowitz regression and evaluate the QMLE and forecast performance of these models in a Monte Carlo simulation. For S&P 500 data, we compare the forecast performance of GARCH‐MIDAS models with a wide range of competitor models such as HAR (heterogeneous autoregression), realized GARCH, HEAVY (high‐frequency‐based volatility) and Markov‐switching GARCH. Our results show that the GARCH‐MIDAS based on housing starts as an explanatory variable significantly outperforms all competitor models at forecast horizons of 2 and 3 months ahead.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary We examine the properties and forecast performance of multiplicative volatility specifications that belong to the class of generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity–mixed‐data sampling (GARCH‐MIDAS) models suggested in Engle, Ghysels, and Sohn ( Review of Economics and Statistics , 2013, 95 , 776–797). In those models volatility is decomposed into a short‐term GARCH component and a long‐term component that is driven by an explanatory variable. We derive the kurtosis of returns, the autocorrelation function of squared returns, and the R 2 of a Mincer–Zarnowitz regression and evaluate the QMLE and forecast performance of these models in a Monte Carlo simulation. For S&P 500 data, we compare the forecast performance of GARCH‐MIDAS models with a wide range of competitor models such as HAR (heterogeneous autoregression), realized GARCH, HEAVY (high‐frequency‐based volatility) and Markov‐switching GARCH. Our results show that the GARCH‐MIDAS based on housing starts as an explanatory variable significantly outperforms all competitor models at forecast horizons of 2 and 3 months ahead.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 143 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary We examine the properties and forecast performance of multiplicative volatility specifications that belong to the class of generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity–mixed‐data sampling (GARCH‐MIDAS) models suggested in Engle, Ghysels, and Sohn ( Review of Economics and Statistics , 2013, 95 , 776–797). In those models volatility is decomposed into a short‐term GARCH component and a long‐term component that is driven by an explanatory variable. We derive the kurtosis of returns, the autocorrelation function of squared returns, and the R 2 of a Mincer–Zarnowitz regression and evaluate the QMLE and forecast performance of these models in a Monte Carlo simulation. For S&P 500 data, we compare the forecast performance of GARCH‐MIDAS models with a wide range of competitor models such as HAR (heterogeneous autoregression), realized GARCH, HEAVY (high‐frequency‐based volatility) and Markov‐switching GARCH. Our results show that the GARCH‐MIDAS based on housing starts as an explanatory variable significantly outperforms all competitor models at forecast horizons of 2 and 3 months ahead.

Key concepts: Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Econometrics, Volatility (finance), Autoregressive model, Financial models with long-tailed distributions and volatility clustering, Heteroscedasticity, Economics, Multiplicative function

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Two are better than one: Volatility forecasting using multiplicative component GARCH‐MIDAS models — Research Paper | ScholarLens