2014•Unpublished venueRequires access

Rhetorical Structure of L1 and L2 Research Article Introductions

Seung Hee Lee, Chul Joo Uhm

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study analyzed the rhetorical structure of sixty research article introductions written by Korean and native English-speaking authors using a revised Create a Research Space (CARS) model. The results show that the Korean authors employed the same rhetorical style as the native speakers of the language did, with the former actually following the model more closely than the latter. The two groups` strategies were, in fact, identical in so far as their use of each move; after establishing a research territory through generalization and background exposition, both sets of authors identified weaknesses in previous research or opportunities for further study and offered their present research to fill the gap. This study may assist novice writers in producing English-medium research articles more acceptable to international journals. The potential also exists for this study to contribute toward the creation of a new guideline for genre conventions in academic writing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study analyzed the rhetorical structure of sixty research article introductions written by Korean and native English-speaking authors using a revised Create a Research Space (CARS) model. The results show that the Korean authors employed the same rhetorical style as the native speakers of the language did, with the former actually following the model more closely than the latter. The two groups` strategies were, in fact, identical in so far as their use of each move; after establishing a research territory through generalization and background exposition, both sets of authors identified weaknesses in previous research or opportunities for further study and offered their present research to fill the gap. This study may assist novice writers in producing English-medium research articles more acceptable to international journals. The potential also exists for this study to contribute toward the creation of a new guideline for genre conventions in academic writing.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study analyzed the rhetorical structure of sixty research article introductions written by Korean and native English-speaking authors using a revised Create a Research Space (CARS) model. The results show that the Korean authors employed the same rhetorical style as the native speakers of the language did, with the former actually following the model more closely than the latter. The two groups` strategies were, in fact, identical in so far as their use of each move; after establishing a research territory through generalization and background exposition, both sets of authors identified weaknesses in previous research or opportunities for further study and offered their present research to fill the gap. This study may assist novice writers in producing English-medium research articles more acceptable to international journals. The potential also exists for this study to contribute toward the creation of a new guideline for genre conventions in academic writing.

Key concepts: Rhetorical question, Exposition (narrative), Linguistics, Style (visual arts), Generalization, Genre analysis, Academic writing, Rhetoric

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rhetorical Structure of L1 and L2 Research Article Introductions — Research Paper | ScholarLens