Evaluating performance of some common filtering techniques for removal of Gaussian noise in images
Tathagata Bhattacharya, Arindam Chatterjee
Abstract
Tathagata Bhattacharya, Arindam Chatterjee
Abstract
In this eork, Noise is modelled as Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN), where all the image pixels deviate from their original values following the Gaussian Curve. Many Gaussian noise removal techniques require the knowledge of standard deviation as a measure of noise corruption for the purpose of setting threshold value, size of the sliding window etc. We have used different filtering techniques, viz., Mean, Median, Fuzzy, Wiener and Sigma to produce a noise-free image. We found that the Weiner Filter does the best job at denoising the image from AWGN.
OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this eork, Noise is modelled as Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN), where all the image pixels deviate from their original values following the Gaussian Curve. Many Gaussian noise removal techniques require the knowledge of standard deviation as a measure of noise corruption for the purpose of setting threshold value, size of the sliding window etc. We have used different filtering techniques, viz., Mean, Median, Fuzzy, Wiener and Sigma to produce a noise-free image. We found that the Weiner Filter does the best job at denoising the image from AWGN.
Key concepts: Additive white Gaussian noise, Gaussian noise, Salt-and-pepper noise, Wiener filter, Noise (video), Median filter, Value noise, Noise measurement