2018•The Journal of RiskRequires access

Estimation window strategies for value-at-risk and expected shortfall forecasting

Tobias Berens, Gregor N. F. Weiß, Daniel Ziggel

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Compared with the large number of value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) forecasting models proposed in the literature, few contributions have been made to address the question of which estimation window strategy is preferable for forecasting these risk measures. To fill this gap, we apply different estimation window strategies to a set of simple parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric industry-standard risk models. Analyzing daily return data on constituents of the German Deutscher Aktienindex (DAX), we evaluate forecasts by backtesting the unconditional coverage and independent and identically distributed properties of VaR violations, the ES forecasting accuracy and the conditional predictive ability. We thereby demonstrate that the selection of the estimation window strategy leads to significant performance differences. The results indicate that forecast combinations are the preferable estimation window strategy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Compared with the large number of value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) forecasting models proposed in the literature, few contributions have been made to address the question of which estimation window strategy is preferable for forecasting these risk measures. To fill this gap, we apply different estimation window strategies to a set of simple parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric industry-standard risk models. Analyzing daily return data on constituents of the German Deutscher Aktienindex (DAX), we evaluate forecasts by backtesting the unconditional coverage and independent and identically distributed properties of VaR violations, the ES forecasting accuracy and the conditional predictive ability. We thereby demonstrate that the selection of the estimation window strategy leads to significant performance differences. The results indicate that forecast combinations are the preferable estimation window strategy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Compared with the large number of value-at-risk (VaR) and expected shortfall (ES) forecasting models proposed in the literature, few contributions have been made to address the question of which estimation window strategy is preferable for forecasting these risk measures. To fill this gap, we apply different estimation window strategies to a set of simple parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric industry-standard risk models. Analyzing daily return data on constituents of the German Deutscher Aktienindex (DAX), we evaluate forecasts by backtesting the unconditional coverage and independent and identically distributed properties of VaR violations, the ES forecasting accuracy and the conditional predictive ability. We thereby demonstrate that the selection of the estimation window strategy leads to significant performance differences. The results indicate that forecast combinations are the preferable estimation window strategy.

Key concepts: Expected shortfall, Econometrics, Value at risk, Estimation, Computer science, Nonparametric statistics, Parametric statistics, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Estimation window strategies for value-at-risk and expected shortfall forecasting — Research Paper | ScholarLens