2014Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull BaseRequires access

Trans-mastoid Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

Thomas Somers, Yi Chen Zhao, Joost van Dinther, Robby Vanspauwen, Jacob W. Husseman, Robert M. Briggs

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective : Superior semicircular canal (Sup SC) dehiscence syndrome is a rare condition, causing a variety of auditory and vestibular symptoms. The traditional surgical management is a middle cranial fossa, extradural approach to resurface the superior semicircular canal. Recently, a transmastoid approach for plugging of the superior semicircular canal has been developed. We present further data supporting the use of the transmastoid approach in preference to the middle fossa approach. Study Design : Retrospective multiinstitutional case series. Material and Methods : Overall 10 patients were included in this case series from two tertiary otology institutions. Sup SC dehiscence was confirmed by correlation of clinical symptoms with positive audiometric, c-VEMP and CT findings. A transmastoid approach was used for plugging of the Sup SC canal. Either a single fenestration was created at the site of dehiscence, or separate fenestrations sited ampullopetal and ampullofugal to the dehiscence. Results : All patients who underwent this procedure had good symptom control and hearing preservation postoperatively. Conclusions : In patients with adequate temporal bone pneumatization, the transmastoid approach provides a safe and effective alternative to the middle cranial fossa approach. This series has demonstrated excellent symptom control and preservation of hearing with the transmastoid approach.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective : Superior semicircular canal (Sup SC) dehiscence syndrome is a rare condition, causing a variety of auditory and vestibular symptoms. The traditional surgical management is a middle cranial fossa, extradural approach to resurface the superior semicircular canal. Recently, a transmastoid approach for plugging of the superior semicircular canal has been developed. We present further data supporting the use of the transmastoid approach in preference to the middle fossa approach. Study Design : Retrospective multiinstitutional case series. Material and Methods : Overall 10 patients were included in this case series from two tertiary otology institutions. Sup SC dehiscence was confirmed by correlation of clinical symptoms with positive audiometric, c-VEMP and CT findings. A transmastoid approach was used for plugging of the Sup SC canal. Either a single fenestration was created at the site of dehiscence, or separate fenestrations sited ampullopetal and ampullofugal to the dehiscence. Results : All patients who underwent this procedure had good symptom control and hearing preservation postoperatively. Conclusions : In patients with adequate temporal bone pneumatization, the transmastoid approach provides a safe and effective alternative to the middle cranial fossa approach. This series has demonstrated excellent symptom control and preservation of hearing with the transmastoid approach.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective : Superior semicircular canal (Sup SC) dehiscence syndrome is a rare condition, causing a variety of auditory and vestibular symptoms. The traditional surgical management is a middle cranial fossa, extradural approach to resurface the superior semicircular canal. Recently, a transmastoid approach for plugging of the superior semicircular canal has been developed. We present further data supporting the use of the transmastoid approach in preference to the middle fossa approach. Study Design : Retrospective multiinstitutional case series. Material and Methods : Overall 10 patients were included in this case series from two tertiary otology institutions. Sup SC dehiscence was confirmed by correlation of clinical symptoms with positive audiometric, c-VEMP and CT findings. A transmastoid approach was used for plugging of the Sup SC canal. Either a single fenestration was created at the site of dehiscence, or separate fenestrations sited ampullopetal and ampullofugal to the dehiscence. Results : All patients who underwent this procedure had good symptom control and hearing preservation postoperatively. Conclusions : In patients with adequate temporal bone pneumatization, the transmastoid approach provides a safe and effective alternative to the middle cranial fossa approach. This series has demonstrated excellent symptom control and preservation of hearing with the transmastoid approach.

Key concepts: Semicircular canal, Dehiscence, Medicine, Middle cranial fossa, Fenestration, Otology, Temporal bone, Posterior Semicircular Canal

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Trans-mastoid Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence — Research Paper | ScholarLens