Are native trees and shrubs better choices for wildlife in home landscapes
Linda Chalker‐Scott
Abstract
Open-access reader
Linda Chalker‐Scott
Abstract
Open-access reader
Many gardeners prefer to use native plants in their landscapes. Part of this preference is the widespread belief that native species are better ecological choices, especially in providing habitat for native wildlife. Most published research demonstrates that the native status of trees and shrubs has little influence on biodiversity. This publication provides a more practical, science-based approach that will enhance both wildlife biodiversity and the aesthetic appeal of home landscapes.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Many gardeners prefer to use native plants in their landscapes. Part of this preference is the widespread belief that native species are better ecological choices, especially in providing habitat for native wildlife. Most published research demonstrates that the native status of trees and shrubs has little influence on biodiversity. This publication provides a more practical, science-based approach that will enhance both wildlife biodiversity and the aesthetic appeal of home landscapes.
Key concepts: Wildlife, Geography, Wildlife conservation, Agroforestry, Forestry, Ecology, Biology