2018International journal of intelligent computing and information sciences/International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information SciencesOpen access

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ROUTING PROTOCOLS FOR MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS

Adel El-Kabbany, Hanafy M. Ali, Aziza I. Hussein, Ben Tawfeek

Open full text 38 citations

Abstract

Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is an infrastructure less and decentralized networkwhich need a robust dynamic routing protocol. Many routing protocols for such networks have beenproposed so far to find optimized routes from source to the destination and prominent among them areDynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), and Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) routing protocols. The performance comparison of these protocolsshould be considered as the primary step towards the invention of a new routing protocol. This paperpresents a performance comparison of proactive and reactive routing protocols DSDV, AODV and DSRbased on QoS metrics (packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, throughput, and jitter),normalized routing overhead and normalized MAC overhead by using the NS-2 simulator. In this work,the performance comparison is conducted by varying mobility speed, a number of nodes and data rate.The comparison results show that AODV performs optimally well not the best among all the studiedprotocols.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is an infrastructure less and decentralized networkwhich need a robust dynamic routing protocol. Many routing protocols for such networks have beenproposed so far to find optimized routes from source to the destination and prominent among them areDynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), and Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) routing protocols. The performance comparison of these protocolsshould be considered as the primary step towards the invention of a new routing protocol. This paperpresents a performance comparison of proactive and reactive routing protocols DSDV, AODV and DSRbased on QoS metrics (packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, throughput, and jitter),normalized routing overhead and normalized MAC overhead by using the NS-2 simulator. In this work,the performance comparison is conducted by varying mobility speed, a number of nodes and data rate.The comparison results show that AODV performs optimally well not the best among all the studiedprotocols.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is an infrastructure less and decentralized networkwhich need a robust dynamic routing protocol. Many routing protocols for such networks have beenproposed so far to find optimized routes from source to the destination and prominent among them areDynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), and Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) routing protocols. The performance comparison of these protocolsshould be considered as the primary step towards the invention of a new routing protocol. This paperpresents a performance comparison of proactive and reactive routing protocols DSDV, AODV and DSRbased on QoS metrics (packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, throughput, and jitter),normalized routing overhead and normalized MAC overhead by using the NS-2 simulator. In this work,the performance comparison is conducted by varying mobility speed, a number of nodes and data rate.The comparison results show that AODV performs optimally well not the best among all the studiedprotocols.

Key concepts: Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector routing, Computer network, Computer science, Dynamic Source Routing, Zone Routing Protocol, Wireless Routing Protocol, Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing, Link-state routing protocol

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ROUTING PROTOCOLS FOR MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS — Research Paper | ScholarLens