COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ROUTING PROTOCOLS FOR MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS
Adel El-Kabbany, Hanafy M. Ali, Aziza I. Hussein, Ben Tawfeek
Abstract
Open-access reader
Adel El-Kabbany, Hanafy M. Ali, Aziza I. Hussein, Ben Tawfeek
Abstract
Open-access reader
Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is an infrastructure less and decentralized networkwhich need a robust dynamic routing protocol. Many routing protocols for such networks have beenproposed so far to find optimized routes from source to the destination and prominent among them areDynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), and Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) routing protocols. The performance comparison of these protocolsshould be considered as the primary step towards the invention of a new routing protocol. This paperpresents a performance comparison of proactive and reactive routing protocols DSDV, AODV and DSRbased on QoS metrics (packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, throughput, and jitter),normalized routing overhead and normalized MAC overhead by using the NS-2 simulator. In this work,the performance comparison is conducted by varying mobility speed, a number of nodes and data rate.The comparison results show that AODV performs optimally well not the best among all the studiedprotocols.
OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is an infrastructure less and decentralized networkwhich need a robust dynamic routing protocol. Many routing protocols for such networks have beenproposed so far to find optimized routes from source to the destination and prominent among them areDynamic Source Routing (DSR), Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), and Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) routing protocols. The performance comparison of these protocolsshould be considered as the primary step towards the invention of a new routing protocol. This paperpresents a performance comparison of proactive and reactive routing protocols DSDV, AODV and DSRbased on QoS metrics (packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, throughput, and jitter),normalized routing overhead and normalized MAC overhead by using the NS-2 simulator. In this work,the performance comparison is conducted by varying mobility speed, a number of nodes and data rate.The comparison results show that AODV performs optimally well not the best among all the studiedprotocols.
Key concepts: Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector routing, Computer network, Computer science, Dynamic Source Routing, Zone Routing Protocol, Wireless Routing Protocol, Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector Routing, Link-state routing protocol